ADDICTION REHABILITATION CENTER IN BOGOTÁ
CALL US: PBX (601) 525 54 39
The Best Mental, Emotional & Spiritual Health in the Americas

The Addiction: Information, Prevention, and Treatment

libro adiccion 4

A comprehensive guide based on the "Future Function" therapeutic model.

Synopsis

Is addiction a choice or a disease? In this foundational treatise, the Función Futuro Foundation —under the technical direction of Dr. Carla Andrea Jaramillo— presents a detailed roadmap for understanding one of the most complex challenges in contemporary mental health.

“Addiction” is not just a specialized manual, but a tool for transformation. Throughout its pages, the reader will explore the development of addictive disorders from a multidimensional perspective: biological, psychological, and social. The book breaks down, with precision, everything from general guidelines and types of substance use to the critical phases of the disease and the mechanisms of recovery.

What You’ll Learn in This Book:

  • The Future Function Model: An in-depth explanation of how genetic and environmental factors are activated in individuals.

  • Neurobiology and Psychology: Understand key concepts such as craving, negative reinforcement, and brain states during addiction.

  • A Practical Guide to Substances and Behaviors: A comprehensive analysis of the chemical and behavioral addictions affecting today’s society.

  • The Path to Sobriety: Evidence-based strategies for intervention and the long-term maintenance of abstinence.

    Written in clear, accessible language without sacrificing scientific rigor, this book is an essential read for families seeking answers, healthcare professionals, and anyone interested in the science of recovery.

Book Details: 

  • Book Title: Addiction: Information, Prevention & Treatment

  • Authors: Carla Andrea (Andrés) Jaramillo Ortíz / Andrés Jaramillo Ortíz

  • Publisher: Fundación Función Futuro

  • Year of Publication: 2019

  • ISBN: 978-958-49-2221-2

Book Preview: Addiction: Information, Prevention & Treatment

```

PART ONE: ADDICTIVE DISORDERS

CHAPTER ONE: GENERAL GUIDELINES
  • To Prohibit or Not to Prohibit: A Complex Dilemma
  • Addiction as a Disease
  • Toward an Understanding of Addiction
  • What Do We Mean by Addiction?
  • Terminology for Understanding Addiction
  • Development of the Addictive Disorder
  • An Analogy for Understanding Addiction
  • Development of the Disease According to the Future Function Model
  • Endogenous and Exogenous Factors of Addiction
  • Endogenous Factors
  • Exogenous Factors
  • A Final Reflection
  • Points to Remember
  • References
CHAPTER TWO: TYPES OF SUBSTANCE USE
  • Substance Use in Addictive Disorders
  • Types of Substance Use and Addictive Practices
  • Responsible Use
  • Risky Use
  • Pathological Use
  • Final Considerations
  • References
CHAPTER THREE: STAGES OF THE DISEASE
  • From the Latent to the Chronic State
  • Stages of Addictive Disorders
  • 1. Pre-Addictive or Prodromal Stage
  • 2. Early Stage
  • 3. Intermediate or Critical Stage
  • 4. Chronic Stage
  • Types of Addicted Individuals
  • The Cyclical Addict
  • The Institutionalized Addict
  • References
CHAPTER FOUR: THE NEUROBIOLOGY OF ADDICTION
  • The Human Brain and How It Functions
  • The Human Connectome
  • Brain Neuroplasticity in Addiction
  • Addiction: A Brain Disease
  • The Reward Circuit in Addiction
  • A Necessary Distinction: Manias and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders
  • Positive and Negative Reinforcement
  • Addictive Kindling and Bonding
  • Brain Comorbidity
  • Premorbidity and Postmorbidity
  • Cyclical Neurobiological States of Addiction
  • First Brain State: Asymptomatic Abstinence
  • Second Brain State: Addictive Allostasis or Unconscious Urges
  • Third Brain State: Craving or Conscious Urges
  • Fourth Brain State: Compulsion or Addictive Acting Out
  • Fifth Brain State: The Event or Discharge (Carrying Out), or Binge
  • Sixth Brain State: The Rebound Effect
  • References
CHAPTER FIVE: PSYCHOSOCIAL ASPECTS
  • Psychosocial Aspects of Addictive Disorders
  • The Importance of Assertive and Supportive Parents
  • Social Skills
  • Codependency, Co-Addiction, and Paradependency
  • References
CHAPTER SIX: PHILOSOPHICAL AND SPIRITUAL ASPECTS OF ADDICTION
  • Spiritual Aspects in the Development of Addictive Disorders
  • Meaning in Life and the Spiritual Senses
  • Philosophical Approaches
  • References

PART TWO: PSYCHOLOGY IN ADDICTIVE, EATING, AND PERSONALITY DISORDERS

CHAPTER SEVEN: PRELIMINARY CONCEPTS OF PSYCHOLOGY IN ADDICTION
  • Major Schools of Psychology
  • Additional Aspects
  • Learning and Neurobiology
  • Stages of Change
  • References
CHAPTER EIGHT: THE THEORY OF THE ADDICTIVE DRIVE — THE PIED PIPER SYNDROME
  • The Concept of Drive
  • The Satisfaction of Needs
  • The Theory of Motivation
  • Drive in the Developmental and Fundamental Areas of Human Life
  • The Pied Piper Syndrome
  • Secondary Drive and Addiction
  • How to Overcome the Addictive Drive
  • References
CHAPTER NINE: EGO AND SELF PSYCHOLOGY
  • Freud’s Intrapsychic Structures
  • The Other Facets of the Ego
  • Binswanger’s Contribution to Understanding the Ego
  • Acceptance of the True Self
  • References
CHAPTER TEN: PRIMARY DEFENSES
  • Conflicts of Being
  • Defenses Against Conflict
  • Defense Mechanisms
  • Drive and Defense Mechanisms
  • Reconciliation with Oneself and One’s Environment
  • References
CHAPTER ELEVEN: PSYCHOLOGICAL SYNDROMES AND COMPLEXES
  • Major Syndromes Related to Addiction
  • Syndromes Associated with Personality Disorders and Other Conditions
  • References
CHAPTER TWELVE: SOCIAL NEUROSES
  • Neuroses and Neurotic Needs
  • Neurotic Needs
  • Neurotic Needs for Reassurance
  • Neurotic Needs for Detachment
  • Neurotic Needs for Aggression
  • References
CHAPTER THIRTEEN: CONDUCT: THOUGHT, EMOTION, AFFECT, IMPULSES, AND BEHAVIOR
  • Behavior and Conduct
  • Conduct, Drive, and the Satisfaction of Human Needs
  • Areas of Human Development
  • References
CHAPTER FOURTEEN: PERSONALITY: TEMPERAMENT, ATTITUDE, AND CHARACTER
  • Fundamental Definitions
  • The Relationship Between Personality Components and Addiction
  • Personality Categorization
  • Personality Clusters
  • Personality from an Evolutionary Perspective
  • Personality and Intelligence
  • Binswanger and His Contribution to the Study of Personality
  • Personality Modeling
  • References
CHAPTER FIFTEEN: PERSONALITY DISORDERS, COMORBIDITY, AND DUAL DIAGNOSES
  • The Classification of Mental Illnesses: An Ongoing Challenge
  • Personality, Character, and Temperament in Personality Disorders
  • Classification of Personality Disorders
  • Cluster A Personality
  • Cluster B Personality
  • Cluster C Personality
  • Other Personality Disorders
  • Addictive Premorbidity, Comorbidity, and Postmorbidity
  • Substance Addiction and Personality Disorders
  • References
CHAPTER SIXTEEN: THE HUMAN BEING AND ITS SPIRITUAL ASPECTS
  • Binswanger’s Existential Psychoanalysis
  • The Three Basic Motivations
  • The Person and Being
  • The Spiritual Drive
  • The Importance of the Spiritual Drive
  • The Third Vector: Interpersonal Relationships
  • The Principles of Emotional Intelligence
  • Values and Virtues
  • References

PART THREE: ADDICTIVE SUBSTANCES OR NARCOTICS

CHAPTER SEVENTEEN: DRUGS: WHAT ARE THEY?
  • History and Social Phenomenon
  • From the Ancestral and Ancient World
  • The 1960s: Generational Change and Student Protests
  • Prohibitionism and the War on Drugs
  • From Marijuana to Synthetic Drugs
  • The Role of United Nations Treaties in the Control of Psychoactive Substances
  • References
CHAPTER EIGHTEEN: GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCES WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR ABUSE AND DEPENDENCE (PSPAD)
  • Psychoactive Substances with the Potential for Abuse and Dependence
  • Basic Primary and Secondary Effects of Substances
  • Tolerance
  • Potentials of Psychoactive Substances with the Potential for Abuse and Dependence
  • Potentials According to the Future Function Model
  • Addictive Potential
  • Psychoactive Potential
  • Clinical Potential
  • Psychotropic Potential
  • Toxic, Self-Destructive, and Lethal Potential
  • Reactive Potential — Cross-Reactivity
  • Potential to Suppress Internal Censorship
  • Potential to Improve Quality of Life
  • Damage Caused by These Substances
  • References
CHAPTER NINETEEN: FUNDAMENTAL CATEGORIES OF PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCES WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR ABUSE AND DEPENDENCE
  • Background on Drug Classification
  • The Contributions of Pierre Deniker
  • The Need for a New Classification: A Contemporary Proposal
  • References
CHAPTER TWENTY: PSYCHODYSLEPTICS
  • Delusions Versus Hallucinations
  • Cannabis-Based Substances and Cannabinoids
  • Entheogenic and Psychedelic Hallucinogens
  • Yagé, LSD, and DMT
  • References
CHAPTER TWENTY-ONE: PSYCHOANALEPTICS
  • General Characteristics
  • Amphetamine-Based Substances — Central Nervous System Stimulants
  • Cocaine-Based Substances and Cocaine Derivatives
  • Cocaine
  • Basuco
  • Crack Cocaine
  • Cocaethylene
  • Nootropics
  • References
CHAPTER TWENTY-TWO: EMPATHOGENIC MOOD ELEVATORS
  • General Characteristics
  • Ketamine and Cathinones
  • Ecstasy
  • References
CHAPTER TWENTY-THREE: NARCOTIC ANALGESICS — NARCOLEPTICS
  • General Characteristics
  • Opiates and Opioids
  • References
CHAPTER TWENTY-FOUR: PSYCHOORTHOLEPTICS
  • General Characteristics
  • Neuroleptics or Antipsychotics
  • Anxiolytics
  • Antidepressants
  • Medications for Mood Disorders
  • References
CHAPTER TWENTY-FIVE: “UNCLASSIFIED SUBSTANCES”
  • General Overview
  • Alcohol
  • Alcoholism as a Disease
  • Types of Alcoholism According to Jellinek
  • Treatment of Alcoholism
  • Anabolic Steroids
  • Inhalants
  • References
CHAPTER TWENTY-SIX: LEGAL ASPECTS OF DRUGS
  • References

PART FOUR: ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS

CHAPTER TWENTY-SEVEN: “WHAT ARE ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS?”
  • General Guidelines
  • Non-Chemical Addictive Disorders and Manias: Fundamental Differences
  • Drive and Addictive Behaviors
  • Beyond Gaming and Gambling
  • References
CHAPTER TWENTY-EIGHT: GAMBLING DISORDER
  • The Importance of Play in Human Life
  • Cards, Roulette, and Poker
  • Problem Gambling: Mania or Addiction?
  • Recommendations
  • References
CHAPTER TWENTY-NINE: CODEPENDENCY OR PHILOPATHY
  • Dependent Personality Disorder
  • Codependency
  • Codependency and Drugs
  • The Behavior of the Codependent Person
  • References
CHAPTER THIRTY: SEX ADDICTION AND SEXUALITY DISORDERS
  • Sexual Disorders, Disorders of Sexuality, and Sex Addiction
  • Sex Addictions
  • Treatment of Sex Addictions
  • Sexual Paraphilias
  • Selected Sexual Paraphilias
  • Sex and Drugs
  • Some Reflections
  • References
CHAPTER THIRTY-ONE: EATING DISORDERS
  • Anorexia
  • Bulimia
  • Other Disorders
  • Orthorexia
  • Pica
  • Prader-Willi Syndrome
  • Night Eating Syndrome
  • References
CHAPTER THIRTY-TWO: PREDISPOSING, PRECIPITATING, AND PERPETUATING FACTORS OF EATING DISORDERS
  • Predisposing Factors of Eating Disorders
  • Physical and Physiological Causes
  • Emotional and Psychological Causes
  • Social Factors
  • Precipitating Factors of Eating Disorders
  • Physiological and Biochemical Causes
  • Psychological and Emotional Causes
  • Social and Cultural Causes
  • Family Factors
  • Personality Disorders Related to Eating Disorders
  • Other Precipitating Factors
  • Maintaining or Perpetuating Factors of Eating Disorders
  • Points to Remember
  • References

PART FIVE: RECOVERY AND PREVENTION

CHAPTER THIRTY-THREE: DIFFERENT APPROACHES AND THE HISTORY OF TREATMENT
  • Early Steps Toward Care
  • The Role of Psychopharmacology
  • Contributions to the Scientific Study of Addictive Disease
  • Other Contributions to the Treatment of Addictive Diseases
  • The Treatment of Addictive Disease Today
  • The Spiritual Component of Treatment
  • References
CHAPTER THIRTY-FOUR: RECOVERY: WHAT IS IT AND HOW IS IT ACHIEVED?
  • Foundations for Recovery
  • Neurobiological Aspects
  • Psychological Aspects
  • Social Aspects
  • Spiritual Aspects
  • The Importance of Change in Recovery
  • Stages of Change: Motivation, Action, and Adaptation
  • Tools for Relapse Prevention
  • Protective Factors
  • References
CHAPTER THIRTY-FIVE: THE FAMILY’S ROLE IN REHABILITATION AND PREVENTION
  • The Role of the Family in Prevention
  • The Family’s Response to Addiction
  • Some Recommendations
  • References
CHAPTER THIRTY-SIX: MULTIAXIAL DIAGNOSIS
  • Diagnosis in Addictive Disorders
  • Diagnostic Criteria in the DSM-IV and DSM-5
  • The Value of Multiaxial Clinical Diagnosis
  • Bioethical Psychology in Diagnosis
  • The Senses of Consciousness
  • References
CHAPTER THIRTY-SEVEN: BIOETHICAL PSYCHOLOGY AND EXISTENTIAL HUMANISTIC CONSTRUCTIVISM
  • General Aspects
  • Principles of Bioethical Psychology
  • Areas of Adjustment and the Senses of Consciousness
  • References
CHAPTER THIRTY-EIGHT: COMPREHENSIVE TREATMENT
  • A Systemic Approach to Addiction Treatment
  • Other Aspects of Comprehensive Treatment
  • Sequence of Care in a Comprehensive Program
  • References
CHAPTER THIRTY-NINE: PREVENTION — FUNDAMENTAL PILLARS
  • Foundations for Prevention
  • Fundamental Pillars for the Prevention of Addictive Disease
  • FINAL NOTE
  • References
```

INTRODUCTION

This era, marked by rapid scientific advancement, has brought us great achievements in the sciences. However, from a humanistic and sociological perspective, we have witnessed a decline in personal values. We have seen large sectors of society undergo a transformation of values, as well as many young people struggle to manage their emotions. Certain schools of psychology maintain that negative emotions exist, and these doctrines are producing young people who do not know how to experience their feelings—young people who are increasingly vulnerable and drawn to video games and electronic media—even though all emotions have been evolutionarily designed to help us survive.

Within this context, more and more young people are beginning to use drugs, while public policies are becoming increasingly permissive. This is occurring even under guidelines from the World Health Organization (WHO), which has given drugs the connotation of being harmless.

From a medical perspective, I have observed an increase in anxiety disorders, depression, and substance-induced psychosis. Drug use is growing rapidly due to errors in public policies and prevention approaches, compounded by a striking amount of misinformation and fake news about drugs.

We must understand that everything depends on the perspective from which drugs are viewed. Many books that glorify the use of psychoactive substances attempt to lead readers into a pleasant, magical world. However, these claims are reckless. When we examine the perception of drugs in bars, youth settings—such as music festivals and concerts—and other environments, we find people claiming that nothing bad happens and that drugs are fun and enjoyable. As a result, many children as young as 12 are experimenting with psychoactive substances.

We have evidence of eight-year-old children experimenting with powerful drugs such as phenethylamines, which are distributed in gummy candies soaked in liquids said to contain MDMA or 2C-B—also known as tucibi—when, in reality, they may contain something entirely different. Throughout decades of work in the field of mental illness, we have witnessed the family chaos caused by drugs.

Our difficult work has involved repairing the devastation caused by drugs: seeing a family torn apart because their son developed severe marijuana-induced psychosis, or watching a young woman develop major depression accompanied by mixed anxiety and depressive disorder after a couple of years of tucibi use.

All of this is completely irrational because, from a more realistic and objective perspective, we are the ones treating addictive disease and the consequences arising from the use of psychoactive substances.

Objective clinical and scientific observation shows how hundreds of families have been completely destroyed because their children developed severe psychosis after using marijuana and experienced schizophrenia-like symptoms triggered by the supposedly “harmless” substance. We have also seen a 15-year-old girl develop a psychotic episode that was extremely difficult to treat after trying lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) for the first time, simply because her friends told her that nothing would happen. We have witnessed the development and triggering of schizophrenic syndromes, including degenerative and treatment-resistant schizophrenia, solely because of marijuana use in some cases and, in others, because of yagé or cocaine.

Likewise, we have observed that when marijuana is legalized and begins to be presented as medicinal or recreational, it acquires the appearance of being harmless. Young people consequently increase their consumption, along with the incidence of serious secondary effects.

Many years ago, during radio programs and through documents sent to government institutions and international leaders working in the field of drugs, we warned that young people, as Freud accurately stated, often seek pleasure in what is forbidden. When drugs are presented as harmless, young people consume them. Even then, they want to go one step further, experimenting with acids, DMT, and 2C-B as though they were children’s games.

When marijuana is legalized, young people seek stronger substances. Its legalization has led to the production of more potent extracts, such as rosin and wax, which are genuine poisons for the brain. We have observed that the toxicity of these substances may remain in the body for eight to ten weeks, producing a positive urine test long after the last use. For this reason, we must understand drugs objectively, without glorifying or demonizing them. Accurate and objective knowledge must be presented according to the scientific evidence, and the population must be made objectively aware of the potentially enormous harm these substances can cause by ruining lives, futures, and entire families.

We have seen that the fight against tobacco has produced benefits, as have campaigns against alcohol abuse among minors. However, presenting drugs as harmless is a mistake. For more than 30 years, we have treated the devastation caused by both traditional and emerging drugs. The fact that 80 or 90 percent of people who have experimented with drugs may not have experienced consequences does not mean that nothing will happen to someone else.

Many people develop addictions and psychotic episodes secondary to the use of psychoactive substances. With the growing popularity of semisynthetic substances—such as ecstasy, 2C-B, and MDMA—we have also seen the emergence of substance-induced disorders because these drugs interfere with the serotonin system.

We have witnessed people who, after limited use of these substances, are left needing lifelong medication due to mixed anxiety and depressive disorders or anxiety disorders. Added to this are personality and eating disorders affecting thousands of young people whose lives are gradually eroded by these conditions, destroying their dreams.

We must therefore present drugs for what they truly are and examine the tragic end of the road followed by hundreds of thousands of families around the world. We cannot consider people with addictions to be criminals. A person who uses drugs is not a criminal. Although drug use may have legal implications, it is fundamentally a public health problem because its core is a disease known as addiction.

This is the origin of the title of the book now being presented. It is the product of extensive research and effort, offering fully objective knowledge about drugs, addictions, and eating disorders—issues that are affecting young people today. Through truthful and accurate information, families and society as a whole can take appropriate action.

Because of misguided policies, schools have neglected activities related to inner development and character formation. Responsibility for this education has been assigned to schools when, in reality, it should begin at home. However, families often assume that schools are providing it, thereby creating an enormous void. As a result, our young people increasingly lack healthy character, a constructive attitude toward life, and an appropriate response to the genuine threats hanging over them like the sword of Damocles.

Moreover, because of the financial needs of many families, both mothers and fathers must leave home to work and provide for their households. Added to this is the breakdown of marriages caused by intolerance and conflicts of ego, which ultimately destroy the world of innocent children caught in the middle of their parents’ disputes.

All of this is occurring within an increasingly technological society that gradually absorbs young people until they become addicted to electronic media. These children navigate the oceans of a permissive society that offers every kind of drug, casual sex, and an increasing proliferation of harmful values, making more and more young people vulnerable to addiction.

We are therefore witnessing how drugs act as deceptive and melodious “siren songs” that attract young people. Once they fall into the grasp of these “sirens,” they are devoured voraciously and mercilessly. For this reason, we invite readers to make this book a powerful tool for education, prevention, and treatment, and to ensure that it is present in every home as a deterrent against drug use and the development of addictive diseases.

Dr. Nathalie Ramírez Ayala

Physician and Surgeon

Specialist in Psychiatry

CHAPTER ONE
GENERAL GUIDELINES

Testimony 1. A 55-year-old industrialist.

“My life was unfolding normally. I drank alcohol during my adolescence, and from there I moved on—almost without meaning to and because of social pressure—to using marijuana. Then I moved on to cocaine and spent several years in excess until I developed a strong impulse toward women’s underwear; this progressed into fetishistic transvestism while I was under the influence of drugs. At that point, I began a large number of unsuccessful treatments until I fell into crack cocaine, which represented the collapse of my entire existence. The struggle to move forward from what began with a marijuana joint and ultimately took me to hell lasted several years. When I used drugs, I was mediocre and did nothing but plan my next episode. Today, I have managed to build a small industrial business, and my life has a different meaning. I have restored my life, and the chaos has passed, thanks to the treatment provided by Función Futuro. Today I can testify that I am well, that the treatment works, and to the terrible damage drugs caused in my life, my family, my sexual behavior, and my personality.”

Albert X, patient. (Fundación Función Futuro, 2008)

Across different eras, cultures, and civilizations, addictive disorders have been approached from various perspectives in an effort to determine why human beings are prone to persist in substance use or addictive practices, even at the cost of their own destruction. As Escohotado (2008) states: “Whether by accident or ingenuity, human beings learned to ferment plant extracts and juices to obtain alcohols and then consume them for stimulation. Or perhaps our ancestors tried plants out of simple curiosity and experimentation, seeking to discover their uses and the psychoactive properties of some of them. These customary phenomena ultimately led the human race to become prone to drug use, marking the emergence and development of addictive disorders, often because people did not understand the addictive properties (narcotics[1]) and the medium- and long-term effects of many of these substances—side effects that are now known, documented, and supported by scientific certainty.”

A mythological context may help us better understand the tendency toward addiction displayed by many human beings. Daedalus, who managed to escape his confinement by making wax wings and attaching them to his body so he could fly away from his prison, instructed his son Icarus to do the same, emphasizing that he must not fly too high because the heat of the sun at those heights would melt the wings. Icarus, absorbed by the joy of flying and immersed in the sense of power given to him by his fleeting flight, forgot or simply ignored his father’s recommendations. The sun melted the wings, and Icarus fell to his death in the ocean where, according to legend, the Icarian Sea was formed. In this mythological figure, we can clearly see how the wings and the revelatory experience of flight parallel the use of substances or the practice of certain behaviors that produce a sensation of pleasure. Consequently, in Icarus’s fall and death, we can discern the genesis of addictive disease.

To gain a better understanding of the magnitude of addictive disorders and substance use, it is useful to refer to the distinction made in English among illness, disease, and sickness. Although all three terms refer to a state of disease or significant discomfort, the first, illness, refers to distress experienced as such by an individual. Whether or not it is identified by a clinician, it is something real that arises from what the person themselves is suffering. Disease, in turn, is what the clinician determines the person is suffering from based on advances and concepts in science and is therefore subject to interpretive error. Finally, sickness may refer to behavior interpreted as unhealthy or sickly, whether or not it constitutes a clinical condition, always within a sociocultural context.

Along these lines, imagine a person who asks themselves, for example, about their marijuana use: “I do not know what is happening to me. I keep using weed again and again, starting first thing in the morning. I even wake up at night to smoke, and I can no longer think clearly. I think about using all day, spend my time fantasizing, and do not work.” In this case, we see that the person is ill, experiencing distress intrinsic to themselves (illness). Fifty years ago, this would not have been diagnosed because no formal diagnosis of a substance-related addictive disorder existed. Today, however, we can determine that this person has an addictive disorder (disease). Likewise, if we see a 14-year-old experimenting with a few lines of cocaine, even if he is not addicted, or an airline pilot consuming a substantial dose of stimulants before boarding the jet, we can state with complete clarity that such conduct reflects sick or unhealthy behavior (sickness), regardless of whether the person is addicted. From this, we may infer that addictive disorders, as experienced by the individual, have existed since the very origins of addiction (illness). Although the Greeks already referred to certain deviant and excessive behaviors as dipsomania, or madness for pleasure, and oenophilia, or affliction for wine, it took us more than 3,500 years to understand addictive disorders as a brain disease. Even today, much as the Romans flogged disorderly drunkards with the flagrum[2], many places interpret every form of substance use as a social deviation deserving only punishment rather than sound policies for prevention, regulation, and treatment of the person suffering from addiction.

Much has been written about drugs over the past 50 years, somewhat less about their use, still less serious literature about addictive disorders or addictive disease, and even less about the true medium- and long-term effects of substance use. There are also texts denying that addictive disorders are diseases at all. The brain disease model proposed by scientists such as Leshner, O’Brien and McLellan, and Volkow and Morales, cited in Becoña (2016, p. 119), is astonishingly rejected by that author, who claims that the proposed brain model is wrong “because it is simplistic, biased, self-interested, reductionist, is not based on the existing scientific data on addiction or on the biopsychosocial model, and, moreover, does not serve the interests of users or people with addictions” (Becoña, 2016, p. 124)[3]. This claim is detached from current scientific knowledge. From the standpoint of contemporary theoretical, academic, and practical knowledge, it can be stated with full certainty that addictive disorders are indeed a disease, with a substantial, specific, and measurable brain component. In Colombia, psychologist Augusto Pérez Gómez (1995) follows Becoña’s line by defending the position that addictions are not a disease, which has negatively affected addiction treatment and prevention policies in several countries.

Today, all the research and clinical criteria are available to affirm that dependencies, addictive disorders (AD), and eating disorders (ED)[4] do exhibit clear pathology, evident symptoms, and characteristic deterioration that warrant and respond to both medical and psychological treatment. Some people do not see them as such, but rather as excessive conduct or a moral deviation.

Today, we cannot speak only of chemical addictions; there are also nonchemical addictions. This is why we begin this account by explaining how, since the middle of the last century, our young people have to a significant extent been swept away by addictive disease and substance use. Although these two situations share similarities, studying them reveals that they are very different.

We will gain a clear understanding of what psychoactive substances are and of the different types of use or practices that may become pathological habits or, indeed, addictive disorders recently included in the latest version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11)[5] of 2018. We will see that, although many begin as unhealthy self-destructive habits or vices, they ultimately make the brain ill and disrupt connectivity throughout the extraordinary network of connections in the human brain.

These disorders are, ultimately, a disease whose epicenter lies in the dysfunction of connectivity among certain transmitters associated with sensations of pleasure, joy, and fulfillment, which in some people becomes an obsession and a self-destructive habit. In the pursuit of pleasure, the addicted person quickly sacrifices the well-being of their own life, especially those under the age of 25, who overload these pleasure circuits through substance use. The user devotes increasing amounts of time, effort, and energy to consumption and impairs their ability to meet their needs, experiencing a fictitious sense of self-actualization that is not legitimate.

Unfortunately, it is much easier to develop this disease at those ages. We will therefore describe some of the relevant historical events, especially those that affected the youth of recent decades and their relationship with psychoactive substance use, as well as the proliferation of eating and personality disorders, which clearly display a certain affinity at the brain level (see Part Three, History and Social Phenomenon).

To Prohibit or Not to Prohibit: A Profound Dilemma

Beginning with the studies of Dr. Nils Bejerot[6], an alarm was raised before the United Nations calling for control of substance use and, at that time, for users to be treated as criminals. This concept must be reconsidered, and an organized and coherent reclassification of substances should be undertaken in accordance with what Pierre Deniker (1966/1976)—the first serious modern analyst—proposed in his studies[7].

Although those proposals were highly coherent and well founded, today’s outdated classifications arose from them. Despite drawing on Deniker’s principles, they do not truly correspond to the reality of the substances’ effects. Deniker’s classification became intertwined with terms that do not fit the reality of psychoactive substances according to their effects, regardless of whether they are legal or illegal. This will be explored in greater depth in the fundamental categories of psychoactive substances (chapter on alcoholism). Deniker’s proposals concerning the human mind were nothing less than the prelude to modern psychopharmacology.

As a result of the attack on substances and prevention policies centered on the addictive substance rather than on the person, many countries adopted a general rule of criminalizing consumption. This situation led the Nixon Act[8] in the 1970s to classify substances according to their dangerousness. It also sought to revive and extend the alcohol prohibitionism of the Volstead Act[9] of the 1920s, a measure that maximized illegal alcohol consumption in the United States and strengthened the criminal organizations that profited from its sale (Hall, 2010). Throughout history, strict prohibitionism has been shown to increase social erosion and breakdown. For that reason, possession of certain substances should be decriminalized for specific segments of the population, and their scientific investigation should be deepened.

It is clear that the production and manufacture of these substances should be standardized through safe pharmaceutical processes, good manufacturing practices, and clinical testing, reducing their psychoactive potential and, in fact, their addictive potential. Finally, their sale should be regulated and restricted, as happened in the last century with tobacco in certain European countries, where sales were limited to adults in tobacconist shops. Something similar occurred with alcohol in nineteenth-century Colombia, when popular stills[10] were eliminated and the State took over liquor production, prohibited artisanal techniques, increased penalties for manufacture, trafficking, and sale, and encouraged users to seek treatment through carefully designed policies, as will be explained in the chapter entitled “Prevention.” Without making the mistake of creating governments that run taverns and sell drugs, these markets should be operated by civilian third parties and regulated from the raw materials and manufacturing stages through sale, possession, and consumption—only for certain substances and only for people over the age of 25.

Although we have seen that drug prohibition tends to reduce consumption, it actually increases social harm through incarceration, trafficking, street-level dealing, offenses associated with use and sale, and it also affects public expenditure because judicial costs rise as the prison population increases (Office of the Inspector General of Colombia, 2014). It is therefore necessary to completely restrict use among young people without criminalizing users, while still penalizing consumption by people under 25, since the brain does not finish developing until that age. This makes this population highly vulnerable and prone to developing addictive and personality disorders as a result of premature use.

To penalize consumption by people under 25, a regulatory misdemeanor model is proposed. Under this model, the first time a person under 25 is caught using, they would receive a private warning; the second time, a public warning involving the family and a report to the school or university if the individual is a student; and the third time would establish a mandatory treatment requirement, naturally following a toxicology test confirming that the person is a user rather than an illegal dealer.

Particular caution is required among medical professionals, who must be extremely careful when prescribing amphetamine-based drugs such as Ritalin to young people, as well as analgesics—especially opioids—and anxiolytics such as lorazepam, diazepam, alprazolam, and clonazepam, among others. These can generate not only so-called iatrogenic dependencies[11], but also dependencies that are easily produced in adults. Unless they are prescribed strictly by highly qualified personnel—under the international protocol defined as the functional minimum of pharmacological economy, meaning the shortest possible duration, the lowest effective dosage, and the least potent viable medication—future complications may arise. For this reason, many people, including film and music stars, have died from the effects of using these substances, primarily due to overprescribing, self-medication, and failure to follow prescriptions.

It is important to emphasize that all psychoactive substances, whether addictive or not, have undesirable primary effects as well as secondary or unwanted effects. For this reason, the need for the medication must be evaluated very carefully and monitored. Likewise, it is important for people to follow the advice of their treating physicians, since problems generally begin when medical instructions are ignored and use continues. Indeed, any nonprescribed use constitutes abuse per se and is therefore risky and harmful.

All these substances and patterns of use must be studied from the standpoint of legality, setting aside myths and taboos in order to regulate and strictly standardize their production and consumption. Unless we begin today from an objective understanding of the subject, it will be very difficult to contain the rising tide of substance use.

ADDICTION AS A DISEASE

Because the subject of addiction has been demonized and has essentially constituted a forbidden topic, clinical information about it remained extremely scarce and attracted little interest until the end of the last century. Over the past several decades, science has turned its attention to this field, generating major advances in the study of addictive disorders.

Today, medicine has made significant efforts to understand addiction and the use of psychoactive substances, as well as the personality disorders caused by them. Mental health worldwide has been guided by clinical diagnostic manuals produced by both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the American Psychiatric Association (APA). The clinical manuals used by medicine around the world to identify all types of disease include addictions and mental disorders. The most widely used are the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)[12] and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5)[13], produced by the WHO (2018) and the APA (2014), respectively—organizations that are widely recognized throughout the world.

At present, studies and diagnoses exist regarding disorders associated with drug use; even so, a major effort is still needed. A complete mental health chapter must be consolidated that includes all chemical and nonchemical addictive disorders, as well as so-called dual disorders[14], since it is currently estimated that more than 350 million people worldwide suffer from addictions. This figure would easily double if tobacco were included.

The standardization and categorization of addictive disorders—which, according to twenty-first-century science, are indeed a disease and are the subject of this work—are already defined in ICD-11 (WHO, 2018)[15]. Accordingly, this text draws on the studies of many authors who recognized this decades ago, such as Dr. Magnus Huss[16]. These authors scientifically defined addictive disorders as a disease with an important brain component, a component incorporated only a few years ago thanks to the psychiatric and scientific research of Dr. Nora Volkow[17] in the United States. Her work has been fundamental in demonstrating that drug addiction is a disease of the human brain. She has also pioneered the use of brain imaging[18] to investigate the toxic effects of drugs and their addictive properties (National Institute on Drug Abuse [NIDA], 2014, paragraph 2).

As will be discussed later, if recreational use is approved, it should involve safe substances that have been processed, studied, and professionally manufactured—not empirically produced in dark garages or in the middle of tropical forests. The aim would be to develop a new generation of smart drugs[19] with less harmful impact. Their use should be restricted to adults and supported by coherent and effective prevention and treatment policies such as those we will propose in the corresponding section, because the more illegal a substance is and the more questionable its manufacture, the more unsafe and risky it becomes.

After the repeal of the Volstead Act, William Griffith Wilson[20], known by his nickname Bill W., was the first American to suggest that alcoholism was a disease, contradicting many Puritans who regarded it as something diabolical. Similarly, arguments based on Elvin Morton Jellinek’s[21] research on alcohol affirmed what Dr. Magnus Huss had previously stated. Huss coined the term alcoholism and maintained that compulsive drinking behavior was indeed a disease (Freixa, 2002, p. 135).

Alcoholism—which, from a spiritual perspective, can be seen as a gluttony for intoxication that affects the will—was for a long time understood as a disease of the soul. At that time, when scientific resources were extremely limited, those who suffered from it had only the spiritual path as a possible way out. The Alcoholics Anonymous (AA)[22] program is based on principles developed from the Serenity Prayer composed by Reinhold Niebuhr[23] and, without a doubt, was virtually the only treatment with any degree of effectiveness during the last century[24].

Bill W. (founder of Alcoholics Anonymous) was the first person in recent centuries in the Americas to promote the idea that alcoholism was a disease. Just as not everyone who drinks alcohol is an alcoholic, not everyone who uses drugs is addicted. Even today, that debate continues in certain sectors that seek to disregard scientific research linking addiction to brain function, such as the studies conducted by Dr. Nora Volkow. In them, Volkow demonstrates that addiction has a brain-level component that alters communication among neurons and interferes with their functioning, while also involving the pleasure circuit, which contributes to the development of addiction (Volkow, 2014, p. 18).

Today, addiction is understood not only in relation to drugs, but also in relation to the compulsive pursuit of pleasure, which is defined as nonchemical addiction. Sigmund Freud[25] himself established that unhealthy pleasure can harm both the person who pursues it and third parties; moreover, it is irrational, a frantic or “mad” pleasure. The irrational pleasures we add to our lives are the ones that ultimately become cruel and selfish, often leading to anxiety and unpleasure[26] that precede the pursuit of costly and illegitimate pleasures such as those produced by drugs (Deniker, 1988; Mitchell & Black, 1995).

Along these lines, drawing on meticulous academic, theoretical, and practical research involving hundreds of sufferers, we propose several foundations concerning addiction that arise from our practice at Fundación Función Futuro. Our purpose is to achieve a deeper understanding of the disease of addiction for the benefit of society, families, and individuals in general. These foundations are as follows:

We propose that addiction is a degenerative disease that affects behavior (Jaramillo, 2015) and the biology of the human brain (Volkow, 2014, pp. 19–20). Addiction has biological, psychological, social, and spiritual effects. Its biological impact refers to organic processes, whether neurophysiological or genetic, as well as damage caused to the body. It is also related to personality and identity. The disease additionally has social repercussions for the individual and produces psychosocial maladjustment. Finally, it can be seen how the disease gradually disrupts the person’s spiritual life, reflected in the deterioration of their values and will.

Addiction is a disease manifested through specific symptoms, characteristics, and consequences involving temperament, character, personal power, and every area of human development. The disease acts on the person’s socio-affective and family spheres as a result of irrational impulses arising from effects on thought, emotion, and affection. It is important to understand that this disease develops as a pathological disorder that leads the person to compulsive and self-destructive engagement with certain behaviors or substances. Because addiction is a disease that produces pleasure—at the expense of the individual’s values and integrity—it also produces pain, guilt, fear, and other unpleasant emotions that are difficult to manage and may ultimately generate personality disorders in the person who is ill.

It is essential to begin from the understanding that addiction must be considered a primary, chronic, and progressive disease[27] that, in its most advanced stages, acts as a precursor and cause of severe behavioral disturbances. Although some sectors classify it as a primary disease, it may be induced by personality disorders and other psychiatric problems such as bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. This shows that personality disorders can trigger addiction because they produce instability and internal imbalance, leading to deterioration in the person’s life and to avoidance-based practices intended to create an apparent, temporary sense of well-being through use or behavior—practices that ultimately become self-destructive.

We see a common denominator here: substance abuse driven by impulsive behaviors involving the pursuit of pleasure, placing both one’s own life and the lives of others at risk. In many cases, the disease may therefore be produced by other psychological disorders or, in the case of the genetically predisposed addict, frequent use alone may be enough for it to develop. In fact, it produces serious secondary distress in the behavioral, biological, psychological, spiritual, and social life of the person who suffers from it. Unless treated in time, it leads the person into bizarre and self-destructive situations that foster pain and guilt, as well as a vast process of maladjustment and social marginalization.

Addiction is a chronic disease because it is incurable. The only way to halt its progression is by achieving abstinence, developing productive and healthy coping patterns—primarily autonomy, self-esteem, and self-control—and transforming negative values into positive ones. Experience has shown that, in most cases, appropriate and personalized comprehensive interdisciplinary therapeutic treatment is necessary in order to achieve the person’s full recovery. Such treatments are highly effective because, through the containment of symptoms, the addicted person learns to construct coping patterns for managing the disease, helping them gain control over it and improve their quality of life.

Addiction is understood as a progressive disease because its symptoms increase over time. Consequently, failure to pursue recovery inexorably leads the patient toward marginalization: psychiatric institutions, prisons, mental and physical illness, the streets, and even death. A survey conducted at Fundación Función Futuro (2017) demonstrated that addiction rehabilitation and prevention treatments based on a comprehensive approach are the most appropriate because they simultaneously address symptom containment in each sphere affected by the disease. This leads the person not only to understand, but also to confront and resolve the specific symptoms of their illness.

Addictive disease is considered a behavioral aberration. This is because use and practice alter personality, affect temperament, and impair an individual’s capacity to relate to themselves and to their environment. They also divert the person’s sense of purpose because of distortions in perception and extreme reactivity. It is important to note that the addicted person’s decision-making capacity becomes impaired, as do character and will. Consequently, the disease leads the person to act against their principles and, as a result, causes the gradual erosion of self-esteem, autonomy, and self-control, among other coping mechanisms used to face existential realities.

As a self-destructive disease, addiction attacks the different areas of a person’s life, including the biological, cognitive, emotional, occupational or academic, socio-affective, sexual, economic, and spiritual areas. This shows that personality is also affected: changes occur in affection, character, behavior, and temperament, and the addicted person departs from ethical and moral standards. Substance use often becomes a power greater than the person themselves, leading them to abandon their goals of survival and transcendence. For this reason, driven by the disease, the addicted person loses the capacity to choose and relinquishes responsibilities, priorities, principles, and values.

TOWARD AN UNDERSTANDING OF ADDICTION

What Do We Mean by Addiction?

As noted, addiction is one of the oldest known diseases. In ancient Greece, alcohol addiction was called oenophilia. At that time, bacchanals—festivals dedicated to the god Bacchus[28]—were widely known and were later embraced even more fully during the Roman Empire. During these celebrations, people drank to the point of intoxication; in practice, this constituted abusive consumption. This demonstrates how, from the beginning of civilization, some people with particular neurophysiological and psychological predispositions began to act compulsively in search of easy pleasure.

The cost of obtaining momentary pleasure is extremely high because it only generates subsequent pain far greater than the discomfort the person initially sought to relieve or avoid. Thus, when the pleasure circuit is excited, the brain forms rapid connections to obtain dopamine[29], leading to overstimulation of its production. This excessive stimulation creates the conscious or unconscious need to repeat the stimulus again and again, thereby intensifying the disease. In this way, profound deterioration develops in the person and affects those closest to them. The individual experiences a sense of “being fulfilled,” but this is a fictitious chemical sensation produced by a bombardment of neurotransmitters in the brain, eventually consuming the person to the point that they live for and through substance use.

The term addiction[30] comes from the Latin addictio, meaning “assignment by judicial sentence” (Dictionary of the Spanish Language [DLE], 2020). It does not refer only to the use of psychoactive substances. Although not every addictive behavior is formally recognized as such, addiction encompasses all kinds of compulsive behavior, including gambling compulsion (gambling disorder), shopping, sex (libidopathy)[31], friendships, people and romantic attachments (philopathy)[32], high-risk situations such as extreme sports, the Internet, work, physical exercise (muscle dysmorphia), stress, and other behaviors that begin through a mechanism of rapid pleasure, absorb the sufferer, and ultimately generate suffering. Hence the etymological root -pathy, from the Greek páthos, meaning “suffering” (DECEL, 2020a).

Some specialists consider eating disorders such as bulimia, anorexia, and orthorexia to be closely related to addictions because of the suffering expressed during abstinence, the loss of control while the disease is active, and the consequence of a particular obsessive practice: guilt and pain. Moreover, virtually the same brain regions are affected in these types of disease, and they ultimately become severe disorders—highly disabling disturbances—in the connectivity of neural networks.

In broad terms, all addictions, eating disorders, and personality disorders are behavioral disorders and diseases[33] that share similar psychological implications; what varies is the preferred self-destructive substance or behavior[34]. The addicted person’s stage of illness is determined by the substance’s addictive power, the organic damage caused, and the disruption of personality. In short, these are attachments to behavior[35] that produce suffering and unwanted phenomena associated with withdrawal and consequence syndromes. They abnormally stimulate the mechanics of pleasure through the secretion of neurotransmitters—which produce pleasant sensations—and through connectivity among neurons and brain networks.

It has been shown, for example, that when a person wins a game of blackjack or experiences an orgasm, the body releases the same substances and stimulates nearly the same brain centers as when cocaine-related substances are ingested or other behaviors are successfully performed.

It is worth adding that the term addiction is a relatively recent neologism used to define behaviors that become attached to a particular pattern. The word addiction was not used in diagnostic manuals and is not accepted by certain sectors, but we will continue to use it because substance addictions[36], drug dependence, chemical dependence, and nonchemical dependence have often been confused with terminology incorrectly used even by WHO expert committees. Addictions, dependencies, abuse, harmful use, and other pathologies should not be grouped under a single classification, as the latest versions of the ICD and DSM do under the title Addictive Disorders.

Addiction is often regarded as a moral deficiency, although it is not one, even if it may eventually produce such deterioration. It is a disease like any other and can affect anyone without distinction of social status, intelligence, morality, age, race, or creed. Technically, it may be included among obsessive-compulsive mental and behavioral disorders, in which performing a certain action is intended to relieve tension, anxiety, and emotional anguish caused by the negative sensations generated in the body by deprivation of the substance (see neurobiology of addictions, double-reinforcement theory). It could likewise fall within impulse-control disorders and manias. Nevertheless, it is highly specific and should be treated as a separate chapter because it always involves the pleasure circuit.

Although clinical diagnostic manuals still do not address addiction in its true scope, our experience treating hundreds of addicted people and our in-depth knowledge of the disease lead us to conclude that 90 percent of this population has a dual diagnosis because of mental, family, and social traits and implications. This, in turn, affects levels of emotional, social, affective, and spiritual intelligence and, consequently, the individual’s awareness of themselves, their surroundings, and God.

Terminology for Understanding

The study of substance use has led us to adopt words from other medical or social disciplines and to create certain terms. Such is the case with kindling, craving, and bonding.

Although addictive behaviors are very old, as we have explained throughout this section, the extremely high destructive and addictive potential of psychoactive substances has increased over time. Some people have greater addictive kindling than others; that is, they are more prone to developing addictions. This is determined by their genotype or genetic predisposition. Psychological predisposition, or psychotype, also has a strong influence on the development of an addictive disorder, as does biotype, which implies that certain races and genders may be more susceptible to some substances than others.

Addictive kindling is a person’s vulnerability to a substance. It may be inherited or genetically transmitted because the relevant gene may be present in a person’s DNA, making them more vulnerable to developing the disease. This term is frequently used in both neurology and psychiatry. In neurology, it is “the tendency of certain parts of the brain to react to repeated low-level bioelectrical stimulation through a progressive increase in synaptic discharges, thereby lowering seizure thresholds” (Segen, 1992).

In psychiatry, the term refers to “an increase in susceptibility to suicide or other forms of mental decompensation linked to recurrent stress” (Breskin, Dumith, Pearsons & Seeman, 2007). In short, we define addictive kindling as an unknown individual factor that influences whether the disease develops according to the addictive power of the substance; in other words, it is a precursor or neurobiological sensitivity to developing the brain-level component of addiction.

Bonding comes from the English verb bond, meaning to attach. It refers to the addictive potential of a substance or behavior—that is, the force with which it attaches a person to using that substance. Drugs have psychoactive potentials that differ from their addictive potential. For example, nicotine has little psychoactive potential but very strong addictive potential, so a substance’s bonding is not determined by how dramatic its effects may be.

One aspect of vital importance is massive thinking, which is the intrusive thought of repeating the practice and which gradually and undesirably takes possession of the sufferer’s mind; in other words, it is an unconscious cerebral desire that is projected into consciousness. Another aspect is appetite, or involuntary emotional desire, known as craving. Finally, if the addicted person decides to use again, the searching phase develops, during which the person feels compelled to obtain and use the substance.

Withdrawal and consequence syndromes, which we mention frequently, are also important. On the one hand, withdrawal syndrome is the set of unpleasant and unwanted physical, psychological, and neurological sensations that drive the addicted person to resume use or behavior obsessively and compulsively because, without these acts, they feel empty and lifeless[37]; it is a source of suffering. On the other hand, consequence syndrome encompasses all the phenomena that occur after the addictive episode: feelings of guilt, worthlessness, pain, fear, unease, anger, and paranoia. Through renewed overstimulation of the limbic system[38] and the dopaminergic or pleasure circuit, the person once again attempts to suppress and avoid these phenomena of decompensation and imbalance by means of another discharge of pleasure.

DEVELOPMENT OF THE ADDICTIVE DISORDER

We emphasize that no one decides to become addicted. Once this unwanted event or brain accident begins, intrusive thoughts of use become increasingly frequent and overwhelming (massive thinking). These thoughts also strongly influence the development of an addictive disorder because they become more recurrent and intense and lead to cravings. We have called them massive thoughts because of the way they become increasingly deeply rooted in the person. Intrusive or invasive thoughts function as a precursor to craving in the addicted person. The word craving refers to an intense desire. In our case, it is a desire or urge whose satisfaction becomes the primary concern of the person’s daily life, accompanied by an ever-growing frenzy to repeat the addictive act or ritual.

In this way, addiction ultimately takes control of the person’s capacity to choose, alters their personality, and modifies certain brain functions, including connectivity among neurons, which helps determine the frequency and intensity of addictive practices. Once self-control has been lost because of an addictive practice, it is very difficult to recover. The only way to halt its progression is through abstinence and, from that great effort, to develop a process of brain neuroplasticity—the brain’s capacity to reconnect and repair itself by generating new connections and allowing old ones to fade.

Addictive disease directly interferes with certain brain circuits, altering their processing of pleasure and the balance of neurotransmitter secretion (González and Matute, 2013, p. 9). Indeed, drugs cause not only neuronal maladaptation and intoxication; for this reason, damage tends to be greater in chemical addictions. Even so, nonchemical addictions also produce strong dependence through adaptation and maladaptation, which likewise causes connectivity problems in neurons, circuits, and brain systems. In summary, it is a disorder of the reward circuit: the pre-addicted person and the addicted person want the reward without the effort. In this way, the pursuit of pleasure leads to use or behavior—a dangerous shortcut for obtaining a quick and easy pleasurable stimulus with little effort.

Consequently, the individual’s mind is altered by the obsessive-compulsive phenomenon, by engagement in the addictive habit, or by the unwanted phenomena of withdrawal and consequence syndromes. All of this deepens personal and family suffering and drives the addicted person to repeat a new cycle. In the most thoroughly analyzed cases, the individual’s identity (ego) is also fractured, generating a use-induced split in the ego that ultimately causes the personality to fade.

Addiction has often been confused with upbringing problems or social deviance. It is a disease with neurophysiological, social-environmental, psychological, biological, and spiritual components, requiring a coherent, interdisciplinary, and specific therapeutic response in both prevention and treatment. Although many addictions begin as vices or excesses, their primary core is a brain imbalance that arises without warning, depending on the addictive power of the substance (bonding) in relation to the person’s vulnerability (kindling).

Genes have now been isolated in the DNA chain, markers associated with addiction have been identified (Fonseca, 2017, pp. 22–28), and abnormal neurophysiological reactions involving certain brain substances are known. In addicted people, these substances do not respond in the same way as they do in those without addictive disease. For this reason, the addicted person is not responsible for suffering from the disease, even when it begins in many cases through harmful habits. Nevertheless, the person who is ill is fully responsible for knowing when to ask for help in resolving their pattern of use.

The body of an addicted person does not respond in the same way as that of a nonaddicted person when exposed to a substance or addictive behavior. For this reason, it was once thought that alcoholics had some kind of allergy. This was proposed almost one hundred years ago by Bill W., founder of Alcoholics Anonymous, whom we mentioned earlier. Today, thanks to psychiatrist Nora Volkow’s research using positron emission tomography of the brain, we know with complete certainty that addiction is not a personal decision but rather a brain accident that affects many brain processes, including neurotransmitter secretion. When these neurotransmitters “are affected by the neurotoxicity of substances, the connections between neurons are compromised” (Volkow, 2014, p. 17).

This interpretation makes some sense when the body’s reaction is understood at the neurological and psychological levels rather than as a virulent physical response to the toxic substance or extreme excitation. In other words, the reaction of an alcoholic or addicted person in general is not virulent, but it does trigger an abnormal and reactive process that, in certain individuals and because of biological or endogenous factors, activates processes very different from those experienced by a healthy person. In an addicted person, the first dose triggers an electrochemical reaction in the brain that creates a series of turbulent phenomena in brain connectivity[39], severely affecting thought, emotion, and affection. As a result, the addicted person eventually continues not because using feels pleasurable, but because another dose is needed. It also confronts the person with loss of self-control, lack of personal power in the face of the addictive power of the behavior, and withdrawal syndrome. We will explain this scientifically and in detail later through an objective analysis of what sufferers themselves describe in the first and second steps of Alcoholics Anonymous: insanity, powerlessness, and unmanageability[40].

The brain of an addicted person is unable to absorb or balance the emotional intensity produced by brain chemicals released or inhibited after the addictive practice. For this reason, the person loses mental equilibrium, which begins to affect daily life. The addicted person is not to blame for experiencing this reaction. It is an organic matter that works in a way quite similar to what happens when a person with diabetes consumes sugar: the body cannot tolerate it and reacts in a completely different way from a healthy body.

In the addicted organism, the contradictory need is created to once again use or practice the very thing that caused harm. “Unwanted” desires arise from a cerebral thirst that consciously and unconsciously seeks the stimulus in order to flood the brain with a particular neurotransmitter, in association with dopamine, depending on the specific addiction. Let us remember that craving is the phenomenon of spontaneous and intrusive desires or appetites; these are not intentions to use or actively seek the substance. As the disease advances, the doing, or discharge—the direct behavioral stimulus—increases in intensity. However, the duration of pleasure decreases, producing the rebound effect of neuro-maladaptation in the person.

For addicted people, satisfying the desire to use becomes their primary reason for living. The addicted person almost always defends the disease at any cost in a wholly irrational way because they have lost sound judgment and the ability to choose whether to engage in the addictive behavior. Unwanted enslavement to the compulsive practice causes suffering because, in a contradictory and undesired manner, the cycle restarts under the pressure of a powerful internal drive to perform the behavior again. The result is the heavy yoke of addiction.

From the uncontrolled desire to buy objects, through compulsive eating and sexual obsessions with pleasure, to lines of cocaine, designer drugs, pills, gambling, heroin, and many other behaviors, all share the same principle: making people feel good through euphoric discharges of sudden well-being. But this pleasure is nothing more than an illusion. Over time, these behaviors generate increasing pain, fear, and guilt, while the self-destructive interval also grows. In subsequent periods, the individual associates the effects with the initial stage of use known as the “honeymoon”[41], rather than with the devastating outcomes of later stages that arise during precontemplation, are reinforced during contemplation, and remain for life.

As already stated, not everyone who uses substances or occasionally engages in pleasurable behaviors is addicted. An addicted person is therefore someone who seeks to engage in these practices obsessively, as well as someone who performs them in an unwanted and compulsive way, violating their own ethical and moral principles. In this way, the addicted person harms both themselves and others. Beginning addictive behaviors is like crossing a minefield or playing Russian roulette. A mine may not explode and a bullet may not fire on that attempt, but the most sensible course is not to keep doing it, because if this dangerous game of chance continues, eventually the bullet will fire. Beginning or continuing addictive practices is extremely risky because the person proceeds without knowing whether they carry the genetic component of the disease; even if they do not, continued abuse may awaken addiction.

The mental compulsion to use or engage in the behavior begins much like the formation of a custom. The habit starts absorbing the individual’s units of attention, action, and intention until the person lives for and through the addiction, trampling emotional, affective, spiritual, intellectual, moral, and material values along the way. The addicted person eventually becomes socially stigmatized and academically and occupationally disabled, devoting most of life to active addiction because the disturbance in drive[42] is highly significant.

Some addictions begin as an attempt to escape reality, others through social stress or peer pressure, some through what is now understood as the theory of unconscious self-medication[43], and still others through simple curiosity or attraction to novelty. When certain actions are repeated, a habit is formed and a connection to a particular pleasure is established. This activates the biological component. In the genetically predisposed addict, even relatively brief exposure to the stimulus may be enough to trigger the disease. Becoming addicted requires not only a genetic component that predisposes a person to the disease, but also contact—not necessarily prolonged—with the addictive practice, environmental factors, emotional hypersensitivity, and distortions in self-concept toward either self-devaluation or an omnipotent overvaluation of oneself.

An Analogy for Understanding Addiction

To better understand this phenomenon, we will use the analogy of a snow-covered mountain, a trench, and a sled. The brain is the snowy mountain; the habit is the track or trench carved by the sled as it descends; when the trench becomes deep, it represents dependence; and the weight of the sled represents the addictive power of the substance. Hard snow represents a brain resistant to developing addiction, while soft snow represents a brain sensitive to the substance’s addictive power. Thus, the heavier the sled, the more easily it carves the track or trench. After traveling over it again and again, the path becomes so deep that the sled is trapped and cannot get out. The greater the addictive potential of the substance, the more difficult it is for the person to escape the habit. The only way out is by establishing a new connection, which constitutes a process of brain adaptation to abstinence (brain neuroplasticity).

The hardness of the snow represents the individual’s resistance according to their behavioral phenotype, including genetic, psychological, and biological characteristics. Some people resist; others do not. Finally, the steepness of the slope represents psychoactive potential, depending on the substance’s capacity to create distorted perceptions and sensations. Control is lost because of the incline. We have even seen several cases in which dependence ceased following a substance-induced psychosis, but severe and often permanent damage remained. It should also be noted that substances may have clinical potential and, when properly used, correctly prescribed by a physician, and faithfully followed by the patient, can unquestionably improve quality of life. In this way, psychopharmacological therapy can serve as valuable support for treatment and recovery.

DEVELOPMENT OF THE DISEASE ACCORDING TO THE FUNCIÓN FUTURO MODEL

In their book Introduction to Addictive Behaviors (2019), Thombs and Osborne explain that addictions—although approached from diverse perspectives such as moral deficiency, the culmination of maladaptive behavior, spiritual impairment, or deterioration of values—are a progressive disease with genetic and epigenetic markers. In the Función Futuro Model for the development of the disease (Diagram 1), we propose that environmental influence takes root only in a favorable personal attitude and that use and abuse trigger the neurophysiological component (A). This is precisely the “target” of our prevention policies through accurate information, early detection, appropriate professional intervention, the promotion of values, and the development of emotional, social, affective, and spiritual intelligences, all of which provide the tools for a strong, modern, and updated program. This is possible through interdisciplinary processes guided by physicians, psychiatrists, and counselors who are highly trained for this purpose.

The further science advances, the closer we come to finding a solution to addiction. Nevertheless, because it is a disease with strong social, psychological, and environmental components, it requires interdisciplinary care for both prevention and treatment. Although a wide range of medications has been developed, studies conducted at Fundación Función Futuro (2017) indicate that the best path to recovery is comprehensive treatment. It should be psychodynamic in nature, have a clearly cognitive orientation, and be accompanied by a spiritual path and psychosocial care. When necessary, treatment should be supported by pharmacological therapy under the principle of using the smallest possible amount of medication for the shortest possible period. We will return to this issue in Part Five of this book.

ENDOGENOUS AND EXOGENOUS FACTORS OF ADDICTION

Addictions do not arise in isolation. They result from personality imbalance, unresolved neurotic needs, and immature ways of coping with reality (defenses). Once the disease is active, neither the endogenous genetic component—which is inherited—nor the neurophysiological component should be overlooked. Once the addicted person begins using, they cannot stop; they become obsessed with it and secretly plan it. Recurrent use or engagement in the behavior is the most critical symptom of the disease and is determined by both endogenous and exogenous factors (Ortiz, 2008, p. 35).

First, endogenous factors are those within the addicted person: physiology, thoughts, personality, defenses, coping patterns, and emotions. Second, exogenous factors are the events, people, and circumstances surrounding the addicted person that lead the disease to continue developing. In reality, consumption is only the tip of the iceberg. Behind abusive and dependent use lie defense mechanisms, neurotic needs, ambivalence, and erosion of coping patterns that are remarkably similar across addictions. Both types of factor will be examined below.

Endogenous Factors

Before the disease is fully developed, endogenous factors in the psychological sphere concern the individual’s internal response to perceiving, reacting to, and relating with the environment. They are of three types: neurophysiological, biological or physical, and psychological; for some individuals, they may also be spiritual because of the displacement of internal values.

In general, these factors include ideologies favoring addictive practices or apologetic attitudes, emotional immaturity, the search for acceptance and respect through acts outside established limits, problems with self-esteem, inferiority complexes and feelings of inadequacy within a group, inappropriate feelings of grandiosity, excessive tendencies toward isolation, anxiety, deficiencies in self-concept, and others that will be described later. They also include problems with autonomy, insufficient personal power in the face of the addictive practice, the individual’s position toward adversity, their perception of pleasure and its consequences, difficulties socializing, and their reactions within affective and social environments generally. Addiction may also develop in people prone to isolation, emotionally unstable individuals, and young people or adults with social anxiety.

Addiction has an important endogenous neurophysiological component represented by inappropriate neuronal responses to signals from certain brain chemicals secreted during the ingestion of psychoactive substances, the performance of particular behaviors, or the absence or deficiency of specific brain chemicals, as noted earlier. These inadequate neurophysiological responses drive the affected individual to repeat the habit cyclically, a phenomenon known as the rebound effect or pendulum effect of addictive practice (Ortiz, 2008, p. 36). When the body is forced to secrete a particular neurotransmitter, it generates a reaction in the following hours or days whose effect is generally the opposite of what occurred during the addictive practice.

The rebound effect occurs when the body produces a substance that creates pleasure while the need for use or behavior is being satisfied. Some time later, that same substance triggers a reaction associated with sensations of pain, deprivation, and emptiness. This reaction increases the need to use or perform the preferred addictive behavior because the pain or uncomfortable sensations of withdrawal must be relieved. The cycle then restarts: later pain must once again be mitigated, and the sense of emptiness grows as the disease progresses. This will be explained in detail in the chapter Neurobiology of Addictions.

In summary, neurobiological or endogenous alteration produces biological and psychological symptoms. It generates overwhelming and uncontrolled emotions, uncomfortable feelings and sensations, unexpected phenomena of appetite or cerebral thirst, and various phenomena associated with the absence or reduction of certain brain chemicals during synapsis, anastomosis, neurotransmission, and the connections among intersynaptic and transneuronal spaces[44].

Second, there is the biological or physical component, which is related to the human genome. Every human being has a distinct genetic inheritance in which there may be a predisposition toward addiction (Kuhar, 2012, p. 101). In other words, genes make certain people more prone than others to developing the disease. However, it is also possible for a person who is not predisposed to develop dependence through abuse of a particular practice and, as a result, for their genes to be modified (Ortiz, 2008, p. 37).

This biological component directly involves several organic systems. Specifically, the bodily systems of the addicted person display irregular secretion of certain neurotransmitters, hormones, proteins, and fatty acids responsible for responding to external stimuli. Consequently, the addicted person may experience extreme pleasure through dopamine secretion[45], vertigo through adrenaline release, pain caused by irregularities in endorphins, attention and concentration effects involving certain enkephalins, and, in people dependent on other persons, irregularities involving oxytocin. Likewise, acetylcholine is secreted irregularly in gambling addiction.

Third, the psychological component functions as an endogenous factor, placing the actively addicted person within patterns of abnormal and excessive behavior. These behaviors are self-destructive and irrational: the person harms themselves, generating pain within the individual dynamics of the self and within the affective spheres in which they are involved. In this way, the addicted person reactively loads their emotions and comes to behave automatically, almost entirely on an instinctive and primitive level. This is reflected in the degradation of affective relationships and the loss of personal power in the face of the addictive practice (Ortiz, 2008, p. 37).

For all these reasons, as the disease advances, personal ethics erode; willpower dissipates because of fractures produced by internal forces pulling in different directions; dignity breaks down with the collapse of morality; and freedom moves not toward genuine liberty but toward a prison that disintegrates the ego and personal identity. The addictive act becomes a partial or total escape from oneself or from the outside world.

In Freudian terms, these are selfish pleasures, profoundly opposed to the ego[46], arising from another ego and directed against the self (Freud, 2002); pagan enjoyments that become obsessive, neurotic, and unhealthy. Their psychoanalytic origin lies in symbiotic dependencies on mothers who may have been either excessively present or insufficiently present, as well as in unresolved narcissistic meanings of the self and of affective and material environments from the past. All of this occurs within a profound contrast between imagined abilities and actual capacities, breaking with the reality principle as it is overwhelmed by the pleasure principle and creating an enormous gap within the individual (Freud, 1920; Freud, 2000).

It is also important to consider wounds arising from parental tension involving the mother and socio-affective stress during childhood (Horney, 1937/1964; Jung, 1916/2002). These memories from the past become triggers for the development of addiction. The person may also be vulnerable because of low psychological thresholds for adequately tolerating rejection, criticism, shame, frustration, betrayal, abandonment, abuse, harassment, and aggression. This creates unresolved emotional agonies and “hemophilias” when ideals collapse, given the adolescent human being’s limited capacity to resolve the spontaneous narcissistic injury involved in the rupture of personal, family, and social ideals.

An addictive practice is often initiated in order to socialize or belong to a group, satisfy a thirst for love, feel reassured about decisions, or experience pleasure through excessive and harmful external rewards. The excuse for these and other behaviors is that this is how life is enjoyed; the body is stimulated, which leads to the secretion of certain brain substances. This compulsive attitude is preceded by feelings of instability, pain, fear, shame, sadness, anguish, and stress, which ultimately lead to self-pity, anxiety, obsession, and justification for restarting the ritual of use or behavior.

In summary, because of endogenous factors involving neurophysiological, genetic, and psychological components, the addicted person tends to be hypersensitive—even before developing the disease—to pain, pleasure, and many other pleasant and unpleasant feelings and sensations. This leads the person to avoid unpleasant feelings or to seek intense experiences without addressing them coherently. The addicted person is then unable to process those experiences and ultimately becomes their victim. As the disease develops and advances, the person also seeks to escape a reality that becomes increasingly obsessive.

This biopsychosocial-spiritual disorder begins in the mind as an irrational thought and as an association between well-being and the avoidance of reality. In Maslow’s terms[47], these could be called illegitimate forms of self-actualization. They begin with the generation of a thought of use aimed at rapid pleasure. Unless eliminated, such a thought causes an unstable attitude and an obsessive-imperative pattern of behavior to take root so strongly that a new cycle is eventually restarted in an uncontrolled manner. This cyclical disorder produces insufficient personal power to control the addictive activity, and the addicted person loses self-governance (Ortiz, 2008, p. 39). The phenomenon develops internally, encouraged by the unconscious, or is stimulated by external agents, as described below.

Exogenous Factors

Unlike endogenous factors, exogenous factors are agents external to the person (Ortiz, 2008, p. 39). They are called predisposing agents, triggers, and facilitators of addiction because they ultimately produce the irrational justification for restarting the cycle of use. It is therefore strictly necessary for the person to learn to use the tools of the Comprehensive Approach to Addictions and Mental Health[48] (Ortiz, 2008, p. 213) in order to identify, confront, and resolve hostile environments in a way that supports abstinence and recovery. Exogenous factors include various circumstances in the social environment, such as dysfunctional families, poor communication within social settings, and hostile environments that do not favor abstinence.

Predisposing agents are exogenous and are primarily related to the person’s social environment. They include all situations and people that generate fear, anger, shame, or pain—unpleasant emotions that trigger a new episode and promote unmanageability in the addicted person. Even without use, the person becomes symptomatic in temperament, character, and personality. A phenomenon of recurrent anxiety develops and produces obsession because the addicted person has very little capacity to maneuver under pressure or to manage drive. Unless this is treated, the person will compulsively and uncontrollably restart a new cycle. Other predisposing factors include family circumstances such as family dysfunction, neglect, tyrannical or permissive behavior, and false information about addiction and substances, which will be examined in the chapter on the family.

Additionally, other agents that promote anxiety and justify relapse include failures in communication with people around the individual, surprising and invalidating attitudes from others, frustration resulting from false expectations, hostile actions by third parties, ridicule and stereotypes from people who favor an ideology supportive of use, permissive behavior, lack of boundaries, and failure to create a perceived need for change within a social environment that favors substance use. We believe that the absence of government policies capable of developing coherent protective, preventive, and recovery factors in response to the circumstances that favor the development of this progressive disease must also be regarded as a predisposing agent.

The irrational justification for relapse may be caused by external triggers that create unwanted cravings and lead the person to restart the self-destructive practice against their own will. For this reason, it is important for the addicted person to control triggers in time by redirecting the intrusive thought toward a positive one, a tool known as mental zapping. When the person adopts a personal stance against substance use through sustained rejection, they are taking a key step in recovery. They must apply a resilient and self-determined sustained “no” and move through the cravings, often surfing the anxiety while remaining aware that, without using, even apparently intense anxiety will pass. It is also important to recognize poorly managed intrapersonal reactions, such as feelings of powerlessness in relation to the addictive behavior. This powerlessness presents itself to the addicted person as habitual and automatic, even though it is unwanted. Other major triggers are irrational beliefs that tend to defend renewed use, such as associations with pleasure and the belief that controlled use is possible.

Facilitators, in turn, are essentially all external factors such as friendships, the availability of drugs, the misuse of money and excessive access to it among young people, and excessive freedom. These conditions create prematurely adult young people who, until they learn to manage themselves, are not prepared to manage either money or excessive freedom. Facilitators also include people who provide money or valuable objects to someone with active addiction. In doing so, they increase and enable the harm caused by the disease, affecting the person’s autonomy and making them even more dependent on what is ultimately the principal source of their pain. We have observed this in many families that facilitate and sustain the development of the disease, in a few cases even reaching a derivative of Münchausen syndrome: producing or taking refuge in illness in order to avoid accepting and resolving some kind of internal or external conflict.

Facilitators do not clearly discourage the addicted person’s self-destructive behavior; instead, through permissiveness, they make recurrence easier and promote use. By this, we mean that a co-addicted family member or friend[49] sometimes becomes a facilitator, going so far as to take the addicted person to buy drugs or directly supply them. Such permissiveness has extremely serious consequences. The co-addicted person seeks to relieve the suffering of their relative or friend. As we can see, the psychosocial component of exogenous factors is highly significant (Ortiz, 2008, p. 40) in the generation, development, and progression of addictive disease. It is not, however, the only factor, despite the claims of certain psychosocial schools that disregard the individual’s intrinsic vulnerability. This has also been demonstrated in identical twins exposed to the same social environment: one develops the disease and the other does not (Friedman & Schustack, 2012).

It is quite common for addictive behavior to be connected with unhealthy sexual behavior, especially in the case of cocaine-related substances and certain designer drugs such as ecstasy. In such cases, the person tends to reinforce the pleasure produced by cocaine or ecstasy through sexual associations such as voyeurism, fetishism, and unhealthy sexual behavior, all driven by a frantic pursuit of pleasure. The addicted person seeks an ephemeral pleasure that brings harm, ruins life, and erodes the belief system, making the person incapable of knowing how to feel, love, desire, and believe. This leads to the development of cross-addictions, in which one generally primes[50] another or several others.

Addiction encompasses every social sphere of the addicted person, including interpersonal relationships and academic or occupational circumstances. The addicted person may become dangerous to themselves and, in certain specific cases, a threat to society. It should be made clear, however, that every determination to change should be supported and the person should not be socially rejected, especially when choosing recovery, because the addicted individual is extremely sensitive, susceptible, and, above all, fundamentally good by nature. Consequently, the person deserves full understanding, affection, and support from society and the family, provided that the family does not encourage or facilitate the progressive development of the disease.

In summary, predisposing agents are people who emotionally destabilize the addicted person and voluntarily or involuntarily force the individual to restart the cycle; triggers are internal components such as psychological predisposition; and facilitators are those who suggestively invite the individual to engage in the practice. All these factors may be confronted and resolved through Spiritual Intelligence (Ortiz, 2008, p. 217), using the mechanics of knowing how to think and believe, knowing how to feel, and knowing how to love in order to act proactively. Finally, it is important to mention that the disease also involves certain defense mechanisms. These are essentially factors with substantial unconscious content—primary defenses used by the addicted person to justify the disease.

The consequences and physical symptoms depend on the addiction involved because every body reacts differently to substances, and the substances themselves have specific effects. Not every addicted person experiences all symptoms, nor are they equally evident in every individual. Moreover, some symptoms are not exclusive to people with addictions.

A Reflection

To conclude, we wish to mention the health impact of addictions. Including cigarette addiction, they are among the leading diseases that claim lives[51]. According to the most conservative estimates presented by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC, 2017, p. 3)[52], 190,900 people worldwide die each year as a result of narcotic drug use. According to Margaret Chan, then Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO), drugs cause approximately half a million deaths each year, and in some respects the situation has worsened in recent years (EFE, 2017).

The repercussions of addiction affect every system in the body, but it must be understood—and this is the principal message—that addiction is a disease that can be prevented and treated. To overcome addiction, pursue life goals, and improve quality of life, the person must identify these symptoms, accept them, and take responsibility for resolving them, since they are the burden that prevents successful development and also triggers the justification for a new cycle.

Points to Remember

Addiction is a fatal disease.
Addiction is a primary, chronic, progressive disease and a behavioral aberration.
Addiction is a disease that affects character and consciousness and gradually destroys the individual’s will.
Addiction is acquired through abuse or through contact with the substance when the genetic component is present.
People with a genetic predisposition or cerebral biochemical imbalance are extremely vulnerable to developing the disease.
Addiction produces momentary pleasure but causes pain and destruction in the medium and long term.
Addiction is characterized by loss of the capacity to choose whether or not to engage in the behavior.
Addictions create pain and emptiness and are continued in order to momentarily relieve the same pain and emptiness they create.
Addiction can affect anyone.
Addiction is progressive and incurable, but its progression can be stopped. When a person has used or engaged in the behavior for a prolonged period and then stops, this does not mean that they are cured; rather, they must remain abstinent for the rest of their life in order not to return to the habits of use. If they use alcohol or drugs again, or resume the addictive behavior, they will be unable to stop and will continue the vicious cycle of use.
Because addiction is a relatively slow progressive disease, it gives the body an opportunity to adapt so that its advance is less noticeable.
Addiction alters the way a person believes, thinks, feels, desires, and acts.
Actions are the product of our thoughts, feelings, desires, and beliefs.
The recurrent use or practice is the most critical symptom of the disease.
External or exogenous agents are the predisposing and facilitating factors of addiction.
Endogenous agents, internal motivators, or justifiers always appear as irrational thoughts and beliefs, poor emotional management, and irresponsible indulgence of desires; they are the psychological triggers of the disease. Their consequences are self-destructive.

References

Alcoholics Anonymous. (2019). Historical Information: The Birth of A.A. and Its Development in the United States and Canada. Alcoholics Anonymous World Services. Retrieved from: https://www.aa.org/pages/es_ES/historical-data-the-birth-of-aa-and-its-growth-in-the-uscanada

Alcoholics Anonymous. (2019a). Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions. Alcoholics Anonymous World Services. Retrieved from: https://www.aa.org/pages/es_ES/twelve-steps-and-twelve-traditions

American Psychiatric Association. (2014). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. DSM-5. 5th Edition. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Médica Panamericana.

Anderson, I. M., & McAllister-Williams, R. H. (eds.). (2018). Fundamentals of Clinical Psychopharmacology. [Translated into Spanish from Fundamentals of Clinical Psychopharmacology—Fourth Edition]. M. E. Ortiz (trans.). Mexico City, Mexico: El Manual Moderno.

Arden, J. B. (2010). Rewire Your Brain. Think the Way to a Better Life. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Becoña, E. (2016). Addiction “Is Not” a Brain Disease. Papeles del Psicólogo, 37(2), 118–125. University of La Rioja. Retrieved from: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5573447

Bennett, J. C. (June 17, 2020). Reinhold Niebuhr. American Theologian. Encyclopædia Britannica [Electronic Version]. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. Retrieved from: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Reinhold-Niebuhr

Bleger, J. (1973). Psychology of Behavior. Eighth edition. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Paidós.

Breskin, M., Dumith, K., Pearsons, E., & Seeman, R. G. (2007). McGraw-Hill Medical Dictionary for Allied Health. New York, NY: McGraw Hill Higher Education.

Castaño, G. (2017). Dual Pathology. In M. Waisman and A. Benabarre (eds.), Addictions: Use of Psychoactive Substances and Clinical Presentations of Addictive Disease (pp. 183–195). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Médica Panamericana.

Deniker, P. (1976). La Psychopharmacologie. Que Sais-Je? 3rd ed. Vendôme, France: Presses Universitaires de France.

Deniker, P. (1988). Les Drogues. Trafic et Contagion. Paris, France: Plon.

DICCIOMED. (2018). Iatrogenic. Medical-Biological, Historical, and Etymological Dictionary [Electronic Version]. Salamanca, Spain: University of Salamanca Press. Retrieved from: https://dicciomed.usal.es/palabra/iatrogenico-ca

Dictionary of the Spanish Language. (2019). Still. Royal Spanish Academy. Tricentennial Edition. 2018 Update. Retrieved from: https://dle.rae.es/?id=1ReMwBD

Dictionary of the Spanish Language. (2019a). Unpleasure. Royal Spanish Academy. Tricentennial Edition. 2018 Update. Retrieved from: http://dle.rae.es/?id=DMtacr9

Dictionary of the Spanish Language. (2020). Addiction. Royal Spanish Academy. Tricentennial Edition. 2019 Update. Retrieved from: https://dle.rae.es/adicci%C3%B3n?m=form

Online Spanish Etymological Dictionary. (2020). Flagrum. Retrieved from: http://etimologias.dechile.net/?flagelo

Online Spanish Etymological Dictionary. (2020a). Sympathy. Retrieved from: http://etimologias.dechile.net/?simpati.a

EFE. (March 13, 2017). Drug Use Causes Half a Million Deaths Annually, According to the WHO. El Tiempo. Retrieved from: https://www.eltiempo.com/vida/salud/muertes-por-consumo-de-drogas-segun-la-oms-67048

Encyclopaedia Britannica. (October 18, 2019). Elvin M. Jellinek. American Physiologist. Encyclopædia Britannica [Electronic Version]. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Elvin-M-Jellinek

Encyclopaedia Britannica. (June 4, 2020). Abraham Maslow. American Psychologist [Electronic Version]. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. Retrieved from: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Abraham-H-Maslow

Escohotado, A. (1998). General History of Drugs. Seventh edition. Madrid, Spain: Alianza.

Eurostat Statistics Explained. (2018). Statistics on Causes of Death. Statistics Explained. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Causes_of_death_statistics/es

Fonseca, F. (2017). Genetics and Addictions. In M. Waisman and A. Benabarre (eds.), Addictions: Use of Psychoactive Substances and Clinical Presentations of Addictive Disease (pp. 21–31). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Médica Panamericana.

Freixa, F. (2002). From Drunkenness to Alcoholism (Magnus Huss, 1807–1890): Concepts Still Current in 2002. Revista Española de Drogodependencias, 27(2), 133–136. Available at: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=305646

Freud, S. (1920). A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis. [Translated from Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse, 1916–17]. New York, NY: Boni & Liveright.

Freud, S. (2000). Group Psychology; Beyond the Pleasure Principle; The Future of an Illusion. [Translated into Spanish from Massenpsychologie und Ich-Analyse; Jenseits des Lustprinzips; Die Zukunft einer Illusion]. López-Ballesteros and L. de Torres (trans.). Madrid, Spain: Alianza Editorial.

Freud, S. (2002). The Ego and the Id and Other Writings on Metapsychology. [Translated into Spanish from Das Ich und Das Es]. R. Rey and L. López (trans.). Madrid, Spain: Alianza Editorial.

Friedman, H. S., & Schustack, M. W. (2012). Personality: Classic Theories and Modern Research. Fifth Edition. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Fundación Función Futuro. (2017). Progress Report on the Outcomes of Patients Treated with the Comprehensive Approach (Biopsychosocial-Spiritual), 2006–2017. Bogotá, Colombia: Fundación Función Futuro.

Geddes & Grosset. (1995). Classical Mythology. New Lanark, Scotland: David Dale House.

González, A. A., & Matute, E. (2013). Brain and Drugs. Mexico City, Mexico: El Manual Moderno.

Hall, W. (2010). “What Are the Policy Lessons of National Alcohol Prohibition in the United States, 1920–1933?” Addiction, 105(7), 1165–1173. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02926.x

Hartelius, J. (2002). Nils Bejerot. About Nils Bejerot. Retrieved from: http://www.nilsbejerot.se/om.htm

Horney, K. (1964). The Neurotic Personality of Our Time. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

Jaramillo, A. (2015). Addiction as a Disease. [Radio lecture series]. La Nocturna Program. Radio Nacional de Colombia (RCN). Bogotá, Colombia.

Jay, M. E. (May 4, 2020). Sigmund Freud. Austrian Psychoanalyst. Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved from: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Sigmund-Freud

Jellinek Memorial Awards. (n.d.). Home. Available at: http://www.jellinekaward.org/

Jung, C. G. (2002). Psychology of the Unconscious. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.

Khantzian, E. J. (2018). Treating Addiction: Beyond the Pain. Collected Works, 2000–2016. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Kuhar, M. (2012). A Psychodynamic Perspective on the Efficacy of 12-Step Programs. In The Addicted Brain: Why We Abuse Drugs, Alcohol, and Nicotine (pp. 216–218). Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press.

Lanni, C., Lenzken, S., Pascale, A., Del Vecchio, I., Racchi, M., Pistoia, F., & Govoni, S. (2008). Cognition Enhancers between Treating and Doping the Mind. Pharmacological Research, 57(3), 196–213. doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2008.02.004.

Mitchell, S. A., & Black, M. J. (1995). Freud and Beyond: A History of Modern Psychoanalytic Thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Specific Model for the Treatment of Addictions. (2013). Co-Addiction: Effects and Causes. Barcelona, Spain. Retrieved from: http://www.meta-adicciones.com/la-coadiccion-efectos-y-causas/

National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2014). Biography of the Director. Retrieved from: https://www.drugabuse.gov/es/acerca-del-nida/pagina-de-la-directora/biografia

World Health Organization. (2018). International Classification of Diseases. ICD-11. [Electronic version]. Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/

Ortiz, A. J. (2008). Addiction and Eating Disorders: Unwanted Desires. Risk, Protection, and Liberation Factors through Spiritual Intelligence. Bogotá, Colombia: Proyecto Función Futuro.

Oughourlian, J. M. (1985). The Personality of the Drug Addict. Psychology Library 40. Barcelona, Spain: Herder.

Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Pérez, A. (1995). Addiction and Disease: Myth and Reality. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 4, 67–71.

Office of the Inspector General of Colombia. (2014). Myths of Drug Legalization. Expanded and Updated Edition. Bogotá, Colombia: Institute of Public Ministry Studies.

Rosenthal, R. J., & Faris, S. (2019). The Etymology and Early History of “Addiction.” Review Article. Addiction Research & Theory, 27(5), 437–449. doi: 10.1080/16066359.2018.1543412

Segen, J. C. (1992). The Dictionary of Modern Medicine. Carnforth, Lancashire, UK: The Parthenon.

Shapiro, F. (2008). Who Wrote the Serenity Prayer? Yale Alumni Magazine. Yale Alumni Publications [Electronic Version]. Retrieved from: https://yalealumnimagazine.com/articles/2143

Sporns, O. (2011). Networks of the Brain. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Stahl, S. M. (2011). Essential Psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific Foundations and Clinical Applications. Second updated edition. Barcelona, Spain: Ariel Neurociencia.

TheBiography. (2018). Pierre Deniker. Biography. Retrieved from: https://thebiography.us/en/deniker-pierre

Thombs, D., & Osborn, C. (2019). Introduction to Addictive Behaviors. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2017). World Drug Report (1): Summary, Conclusions, and Policy Implications. United Nations.

Complutense University of Madrid. (2016). Curriculum Vitae: Elisardo Becoña Iglesias. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness. Secretariat of State for Research, Development, and Innovation, pp. 4–68. Retrieved from: https://www.ucm.es/data/cont/media/www/pag-1786/Curr%C3%ADculos%20concurso%20n%C2%BA%2016094_Censurado.pdf

Volkow, N. (2014). Drugs, the Brain, and Behavior: The Science of Addiction. Updated edition. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIH).

[1] A substance with properties capable of generating addiction or dependence.

[2] A Roman instrument of torture used to whip or flog a person. It had small spiked balls at the end of a leather cord (Online Spanish Etymological Dictionary [DECEL], 2020).

[3] Elisardo Becoña is a Spanish psychologist who has conducted various studies on addiction (Complutense University of Madrid, 2016).

[4] The terms addictions, dependencies, addictive disorders, and addiction disorders will be treated as synonyms throughout this book.

[5] The ICD is a World Health Organization (WHO) instrument that is fundamental for identifying health trends and statistics worldwide. It contains approximately 55,000 unique codes for injuries. It also enables health professionals to share health information, diseases, and causes of death throughout the world (World Health Organization [WHO], 2018).

[6] Nils Bejerot (1921–1988) was a Swedish psychiatrist and criminologist and a pioneer in the study of drugs. He diagnosed drug addiction as a disease, but also attached a criminal connotation to the user, which is paradoxical (Hartelius, 2002).

[7] Pierre Deniker (1917–1998) was a French psychiatrist. He used Thorazine, or chlorpromazine, in the treatment of schizophrenia with great success. He was a discoverer of tranquilizers (TheBiography, 2018).

[8] Nixon coined the term “War on Drugs” and initiated political, military, and judicial persecution against everything related to drugs, particularly their production, commercialization, and consumption.

[9] The Volstead Act is also known as the Prohibition Act. The law represented a government effort to eliminate alcohol by prohibiting the manufacture, sale, or transportation of liquor, although it was repealed after a relatively short period because its rebound effect increased alcohol consumption (Hall, 2010).

[10] A still is an instrument used to distill a volatile substance, consisting principally of a vessel for heating the liquid and a tube through which the distilled substance exits (Dictionary of the Spanish Language [DLE], 2019).

[11] This term applies to any adverse effect produced in a patient as a result of medical or surgical treatment (DICCIOMED, 2018).

[12] Its eleventh version is available for online consultation at http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/

[13] The DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) is considered a worldwide reference in mental health. It is produced by the American Psychiatric Association of the United States (APA). It is constantly updated and has reached its fifth version, DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2014).

[14] Volkow (2009), cited by Castaño (2017, p. 183), states that dual pathology refers to the presence in the same individual of both a mental disorder and an addictive disorder.

[15] In ICD-11, these conditions are addressed in the chapter corresponding to Disorders Due to Substance Use and Addictive Behaviors. It covers disorders related to ten different types of substances: alcohol, caffeine, cannabis, hallucinogens, inhalants, opioids, sedatives, hypnotics and anxiolytics, stimulants, tobacco, and other substances. It also includes gambling disorder (APA, 2014, p. 481).

[16] Magnus Huss (1807–1890) was the first physician to use the word alcoholism to refer to a disease affecting people who had problems or abnormalities due to alcohol consumption (Freixa, 2002).

[17] Dr. Nora Volkow is an American psychiatrist. She is currently Director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). She is known worldwide for research into health-related aspects of drug abuse and addiction and their relationship to brain function (NIDA, 2014).

[18] Brain imaging is now widely used, including positron emission tomography (PET), which shows highly functional areas of the body (Kuhar, 2012, p. 85). Other techniques also make it possible to visualize patterns in the dynamic processes occurring in the brain (Panksepp, 1998, p. 90; Sporns, 2011, p. 23).

[19] Also known as nootropic drugs, a name derived from the Greek roots noos, meaning mind, and tropos, meaning direction (Lanni et al., 2008).

[20] Bill W., or William Griffith Wilson (1895–1971), founded Alcoholics Anonymous in 1935 in New York, United States, in order to help people with alcoholism-related problems (Alcoholics Anonymous [AA], 2019).

[21] Elvin Morton Jellinek (1890–1963) was one of the most recognized researchers into the disease of alcoholism during the first half of the twentieth century (Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2019; Jellinek Memorial Awards, n.d.).

[22] AA is the abbreviation for Alcoholics Anonymous, an alcohol addiction rehabilitation program carried out through local meetings where people with alcoholism meet with others who have addictions to discuss their problems (AA, 2019).

[23] Niebuhr (1892–1971) was an American theologian, political scientist, and writer credited with the Serenity Prayer (Shapiro, 2008). As a Protestant theologian, he had a broad influence on political thought, and his criticism of the prevailing theological liberalism of the 1920s significantly affected the intellectual climate within American Protestantism (Bennett, 2020).

[24] Modern psychodynamic therapy currently recognizes the effectiveness of the 12-step method in treating alcoholism (Khantzian, 2018, Chapter 15).

[25] Sigmund Freud (1856–1939) was an Austrian neurologist of Jewish origin and the father of psychoanalysis. His work contributed to explanations of childhood development, personality, memory, sexuality, and therapy (Jay, 2020).

[26] Unpleasure, sorrow, unease, displeasure (DLE, 2019a).

[27] A primary disease is understood as one that has not been caused by another disease.

[28] Dionysus, or the god Bacchus, was the son of Zeus and the god of wine in Roman mythology (Geddes & Grosset, 1995, p. 334).

[29] Dopamine is a neurotransmitter found in regions of the brain that regulate movement, emotion, motivation, and sensations of pleasure (Anderson & McAllister-Williams, 2018, p. 13; Volkow, 2014, p. 17). When the brain registers pleasure, dopamine activates the nucleus accumbens, known as the pleasure center (Arden, 2010, p. 8).

[30] At the beginning of the Roman Empire, during the republican period, the word addictio—the abstract noun derived from the verb—was used as the Latin technical term for the judicial act through which a debtor became the slave of a creditor (Rosenthal & Faris, 2019).

[31] A term proposed by the author in lectures and radio addresses (libido = sex).

[32] A term proposed by the author in lectures and radio addresses (philo = love, friend, lover).

[33] All actions that can be performed by a living being or an entity capable of movement. (See footnote 32.)

[34] External motor actions of a being.

[35] Behavior is understood as “the set of meaningful responses through which a living being in a given situation integrates the tensions that threaten the organism’s unity and equilibrium,” or as “the set of operations—physiological, motor, verbal, and mental—through which an organism in a situation reduces the tensions that motivate it and realizes its possibilities” (Bleger, 1973, p. 16).

[36] The term drug addiction—understood as a state of chronic or periodic intoxication caused by the repeated use of a drug—was used by the World Health Organization (WHO) Expert Committee in reports that formed the basis of discussion for decades (Oughourlian, 1985, p. 134).

[37] This occurs when a person has developed tolerance to a substance they have been consuming and, when administration is suddenly stopped, a desire to ingest the substance and signs of sympathetic nervous system hyperactivity appear (Stahl, 2011, p. 564). The symptoms are always opposite to the effects produced by the drugs (Kuhar, 2012, p. 61).

[38] A part of the brain that includes the thalamus, hypothalamus, and amygdala and regulates emotions, memory, hunger, and sexual instincts.

[39] A term referring to brain networks, which are of three types: structural connectivity, meaning the “wiring diagram” of physical links within the brain; functional connectivity, meaning the network of dynamic interactions; and effective connectivity, which encompasses the network of directed interaction among neuronal elements (Sporns, 2011, p. 36).

[40] 1) We admitted that we were powerless over alcohol and that our lives had become unmanageable. 2) We came to believe that only a Power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity (AA, 2019a).

[41] We call this period the “sirens’ songs.” This refers to the story of Odysseus returning from the Trojan War and sailing past cliffs from which the songs of sirens could be heard, driving people mad. For this reason, the entire ship’s crew had to cover their ears to avoid madness or loss of control. The initial phase is discussed in greater depth in Chapter 3, Phases of Addictive Disorders.

[42] In Charles Brenner’s drive theory, the term is taken from Freud and defined as the channeling of psychic energy that fuels the impulse to act and manages the human being’s natural anxiety as it moves between dissatisfaction and satisfaction (see the Theory of Addictive Drive in Part Two of this book).

[43] The user consumes in order to unconsciously lessen fear, suffering, and anxiety.

[44] Recall that a synapse is the electrical impulse between neurons that transmits information through the body; anastomosis is the receiving connection involved in neurotransmission. Neurotransmission is the flow of information among neurons within the person’s nervous system.

[45] There is evidence that dopamine is associated with important activities such as eating and mating (Kuhar, 2012, p. 74).

[46] Sigmund Freud, the Austrian neurologist and father of psychoanalysis, studied human behavior through the ego, id, and superego (Freud, 2002).

[47] Abraham Harold Maslow was an American psychologist and philosopher (1908–1970) best known for his theory of self-actualization in psychology, which held that the principal goal of psychotherapy should be the integration of the self (Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2020). He has been ranked among the five most influential psychologists in history by an American psychology publication and is famous for his hierarchy of human needs, among other highly relevant theories.

[48] The Comprehensive Approach to Addictions and Mental Health (EIASM) is a model of addiction treatment created at Fundación Función Futuro and will be explained in greater depth in Part Five of this book.

[49] A co-addicted person is characterized by being preoccupied and absorbed with rescuing, protecting, or curing the addicted person to such an extent that the co-addicted person effectively develops an addiction to the addicted person. Co-addiction is a specific form of emotional dependence that occurs in some people who have an important or very close relationship with a person affected by any type of addiction, whether involving legal or illegal drugs or behavioral addictions such as shopping, gambling, sex, or new technologies (Specific Model for the Treatment of Addictions [META], 2013).

[50] Priming is a term recently used in addiction studies to refer to the potential of a substance to initiate compulsive repetition of use. In primary priming, the process begins with the first dose and compulsively demands additional doses. Secondary priming refers to preparing or leading the person toward other substances; for example, the person starts with alcohol and then compulsively moves on to cocaine.

[51] Lung cancer and chronic respiratory diseases, both associated with cigarette use, rank fifth and seventh respectively among the diseases causing the highest mortality in Europe (Eurostat Statistics Explained, 2018).

[52] The great majority of deaths result from overdose, although diseases, accidents, and suicides directly related to excessive use are also included (UNODC, 2017).

CAPÍTULO DOS

TIPOS DE CONSUMO

Testimonial 2. 32-year-old architect.

“One instance of substance use can lead to another, and what began as avoidance-based use turned into chronic use for me. It was as if one substance led me to another and another, until one was too many and a thousand were never enough. Over time, I fell into a vicious cycle in which I had to be under the influence of alcohol and other drugs all the time.

Today, with the help of therapy, I have been able to manage my anxiety more effectively and regulate my emotions better, as I suffered from a dual diagnosis: borderline personality disorder intensified by substance use and addiction. It was, so to speak, a form of ‘unconscious self-medication’ that destroyed my life. I mistakenly believed it calmed my emotions, but in reality, it only made them more dramatic, chaotic, and unstable.

Today, I have regained stability.”

Angélica X, patient. (Fundación Función Futuro, 2018)

 

SUBSTANCE USE IN ADDICTIVE DISORDERS

Legend tells of the Greek myth of the Sword of Damocles, in which a man wished to be king for a day because he believed it would be easy and pleasant to feel prestigious and powerful. The king therefore seated him beneath a heavy, sharp sword suspended by a thin strand of horsehair, looming as a latent and deadly threat over the man’s heart.

This mythological image can help us understand that all substance use carries risks. It is like playing beneath that heavy sword hanging by a fragile thread, which could fall at any moment and cause terrible harm.

To better understand what substance use is and the different types of substance use, it is necessary to distinguish substance use from addictive disorders. Drugs are one thing, substance use is another, abuse is another, and addictive disease is yet another.

Both the ICD-11 (WHO, 2018) and the DSM-5 clinical diagnostic manual (APA, 2014, p. 281) establish different types of substance-related disorders. The DSM-IV made a clear and rational distinction between substance abuse and substance dependence, with well-defined criteria that differed from one another.

In the current manuals, particularly the DSM-5, although some progress has been made by including a chapter on addictive disorders, it is regrettable that the category of psychoactive substance abuse has been excluded.

Likewise, it is important to understand that healthy substance use is not the same as unhealthy or abusive use. Although these three forms are connected by the common thread of consumption, they are also very different. None should be idealized, nor should consumers be reduced to social outcasts by demonizing those who use, misuse, or are addicted to substances. These are realities within our society that require coherent study, regulation, medical care, and legislation, without resorting to inquisitorial policies in the twenty-first century. This must be clearly understood at the personal, family, and occupational levels, including both work and education.

For this reason, the subject will be explained through a proposed classification of types of substance use, since there is a significant gap in the literature. After observing thousands of users, substance abusers, and people dependent on psychoactive substances over more than three decades, we propose several types of substance use. These categories undoubtedly help clarify the issue and provide fresh, broad, and much more precise theoretical knowledge.

When an addictive disorder is present, certain neurobiological processes involving the brain’s reward circuit come into play. This means that addiction can be said to exist when there is a specific and abnormal stimulus-response pattern within that circuit. It is therefore very important to note that this stimulus occurs in both chemical addictions—that is, addictions to substances—and non-chemical addictions.

These addictions include not only food, gambling, and sex, but also addiction to people, known as philopathy[1]. They are defined as behavioral addictions or addictions to certain behaviors[2], which arise in some individuals either as a response to underlying anxiety or from an extreme search for stimulation among so-called experience seekers[3].

In this way, a person begins with a healthy activity that later becomes impulsive, involving a loss of control over the impulse to engage in it, and eventually becomes compulsive or pathological. Compulsion involves an uncontrollable obsessive desire that leads to the repetition of the addictive activity or ritual. This may occur through behaviors such as eating, gambling, viewing pornography, masturbating, or using drugs, among others.

As mentioned in the previous chapter, addictions are directly linked to the stimulation of pleasure and its overstimulation. Non-chemical addictions will be discussed in greater detail later.

Addictions differ from obsessive-compulsive disorders, although both involve intrusive thoughts about performing an obsessive and uncontrolled action. Addictive disorders always involve pleasurable stimulation through the dopaminergic reward circuit[4], as well as the distress caused by withdrawal, which ultimately gives rise to unwanted thoughts about substance use.

Although many substances affect the adrenergic pathways associated with adrenaline, the cholinergic pathways associated with acetylcholine, and the serotonergic pathways associated with serotonin, addictions—unlike the use of medications and drugs that may stimulate these pathways—primarily involve the dopamine circuit, since this circuit has been shown to be responsible for the sensation of pleasure.

TYPES OF SUBSTANCE USE AND ADDICTIVE PRACTICES

Once the aspects related to addictive disorders have been clarified, the different types of substance use will be examined. There are three main and very different types: responsible use, abusive or risky use, and dependent or pathological use. For example, food may be consumed responsibly, abusively, or pathologically. Although everyone depends on food for survival, eating habits may still be either healthy or pathological.

Although the types of substance use are grouped into three broad categories, each of these is further divided into several subtypes, which are described below.

Table 1. Fundación Función Futuro Model of Types of Substance Use

Responsible use

  • Experimental use

  • Recreational use

  • Social use

  • Habitual use

  • Ritual use

  • Prescribed use

Abusive or risky use

  • Use driven by social need

  • Prodromal use

  • Abusive use

  • Avoidance-based use

Pathological use

  • Iatrogenic use

  • Chronic use

  • Compulsive use

  • Dissociative use

  • Dependence-related use

  • Compulsive-dissociative use

Responsible Use

The first category is responsible use, which is defined as the rational use of psychoactive substances. This means that the individual uses substances on certain occasions without neglecting work, family, or social responsibilities and without placing the lives of others at risk.

Substance use does not impair family, occupational, or social activities and therefore does not result in biological, family, legal, or financial problems, nor in the deterioration or collapse of the individual’s areas of personal development. Technically, responsible substance use applies only to individuals over the age of 25 in the case of psychoactive substances and over the age of 21 in the case of alcohol.

This group can be divided into six different types: experimental use, recreational use, social use, habitual use, ritual use, and prescribed use. Warning signs appear when responsible use begins to shift toward irresponsible and irrational use. This can be recognized when there is a decline in the person’s usual behavior and significant deterioration in vital areas such as biological, cognitive, emotional, socio-affective, academic or occupational, sexual, financial, and spiritual functioning.

The first type is experimental use, which, as its name suggests, occurs during a person’s first experiences with a substance. For it to be considered responsible, it must take place after the age of 25 because, as mentioned in the previous chapter, the human brain does not finish developing until that age[5]. Substance use before this stage is extremely harmful to a developing brain and, technically, cannot be considered responsible. As previously stated, substance use before the age of 25 is considered abusive because of the high level of risk involved.

Experimental use may occur among individuals who function well at university or in the workplace. Screening tests conducted by Fundación Función Futuro (2017), both among patients and other populations, indicate that approximately 80 percent of young people have used some type of psychoactive substance before the age of 25 and have done so at least once more. In this situation, the individual assumes certain risks because every substance has a primary or desired effect, as well as secondary or undesired effects. Depending on the person’s vulnerability and hypersensitivity, these effects may result in serious short-, medium-, and long-term harm, not only by triggering addictive disease but also by precipitating mental disorders.

The second type is recreational or entertainment-related use. When a person over the age of 25 uses a substance for entertainment, their reaction depends greatly on both the psychoactive substance and the way in which it is consumed. This type of use does not endanger the individual’s life or the lives of others. The person remains functional in all areas of life and is aware of both the risk being assumed and the possible side effects.

Consequently, the person maintains control and avoids excess. For example, in the case of alcohol, the individual may drink but rejects intoxication, and the same applies to drugs. The person does not overindulge.

There is no such thing as a safe drug. Every psychoactive substance carries some degree of risk. We must not forget that these substances affect human psychological and intrapsychic processes and may lead to completely unexpected actions, including secondary effects beyond the primary pleasurable effect sought through their use.

In responsible use, disruption to the person’s vital areas is minimal, anticipated, and does not produce unexpected setbacks in either the short or medium term.

The third subtype of responsible use is social use. This occurs when a person uses substances only while in the company of others and does not do so when alone. In this type of use, the individual rejects drunkenness, drug-induced intoxication, and excess. Therefore, the person is able to stop using, does not stockpile substances, and does not think repeatedly about the object of the addiction, whether chemical or non-chemical.

The person enjoys socializing and using some type of substance without overindulging. They do not experience problems when using, nor do they experience significant discomfort when socializing without using substances.

Addictive substances are becoming increasingly socially accepted. Marijuana, cocaine, designer drugs, and alcohol all enjoy widespread social acceptance, particularly among young people. In this way, a person who is not acting under social pressure may use substances to socialize and improve their mood.

Even so, this type of use does not lead to embarrassing incidents, problems, unexpected or disproportionate spending, excesses, unwanted sexual encounters, or relationships with inappropriate social peers.

The fourth subtype of responsible use is habitual use. Understanding that there is a significant difference between cultural tradition and dependence also makes it possible to understand this type of consumption. Habitual use must be distinguished from risky use, since excess is rejected in habitual use.

A good example of this type of consumption is the custom of drinking wine with every meal, which is very common in certain European countries. This practice does not make them an alcoholic population; rather, it is a tradition that originated in the Middle Ages[6], as demonstrated by several anthropological studies (Pascual, 2007).

An example of habitual use may be that of a functional person who enjoys fishing. When invited to go fishing, they occasionally smoke marijuana with friends if it is offered to them. Another example is that of a 60-year-old man who drinks a glass of whisky after returning home from work.

Since neither situation involves addiction or the pursuit of excess, both fall within the category of habitual use, which is classified as a form of responsible use.

The fifth type of responsible use is ritual use. One example is that of a priest who celebrates six Masses in a single day and drinks a glass of wine during each one; this does not mean that he is an alcoholic. Likewise, a shaman may take one or two doses of yagé per day while conducting ceremonies; this does not mean that he is addicted to drugs.

In these cases, substance use takes place within the cultural context of a ritual event—that is, as part of a rite accepted by the microsociety in which the person lives and participates. The same cannot be said of a student who decides to drink yagé, since this practice falls outside their cultural context.

Lastly, there is prescribed use. In countries such as the United States, Uruguay, and Argentina, cannabis has entered the legal market for medicinal purposes. It is worth noting that cocaine was developed as an ocular anesthetic; its medical uses were later replaced by substances that are not harmful to health. Marijuana may be used by prescription, which is why it is necessary to distinguish between the effects of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)[7] and cannabidiol (CBD)[8], as they are entirely different.

THC is the component of marijuana that slows brain activity and produces the sensation of being high. CBD, on the other hand, is primarily used for analgesic purposes and in treatments intended to relieve or alleviate pain. CBD also has anxiolytic properties[9]. However, various clinical studies indicate that one of the major problems associated with cannabis is the development of a high tolerance threshold. This means that a person needs increasingly larger amounts of the substance to achieve the same effect (Haney, Ward, Comer, Foltin, & Fischman, 1999; Jones, Benowitz, & Herning, 1981; Maldonado, 2002).

For example, a person who initially needed six drops of CBD may need to take eighteen drops six months later to achieve the same effect as the first dose.

Another example occurs when a physician prescribes a very strong analgesic or anxiolytic medication to a person who is prone to developing an addiction. This may lead to future iatrogenic use[10], which would then become pathological. It is very important to establish that, when medication is not prescribed responsibly, appropriately, and safely, this type of use can become highly risky (see prodromal use). If the person does not follow the instructions exactly, this type of use may shift from safe use to risky use. Thus, a properly prescribed, timely, effective, and safe psychoactive medication can improve a person’s quality of life, but the specialist’s instructions must always be followed (Stahl, 2011).

Risky Use

The second category is risky or hazardous use. These types of use become habitual in a person’s life and create difficulties for them. This form of use becomes abnormal because of the circumstances and consequences that develop during and after the episode of substance use. In this case, the person places both their own life and the lives of others at risk.

The problems associated with this type of use arise from occasional episodes, meaning that they occur sporadically. As previously mentioned, the brain continues developing until the age of 25. Therefore, the use of any type of substance before that age is considered abusive, since it affects the person’s neurobiological development and increases the likelihood of serious problems in the future.

Within this category, known as risky use, there are four subtypes: use driven by social need, prodromal use[11], abusive use, and avoidance-based use.

The first subtype of substance use associated with this second category is use driven by social need. This subtype includes people who need to have two or three drinks in order to socialize within a group. When people socialize pleasantly while under the effects of alcohol, the brain releases neurotransmitters such as oxytocin and dopamine. As a result, substance use produces a surge of pleasurable neurotransmitters. If the person does not take steps to avoid intoxication, they may eventually develop an addiction problem.

Use driven by social need is therefore risky because the person may develop an addictive disorder at any time. It is very important to pay close attention to this type of use, since the person experiences the substance as a necessity or a crutch in order to socialize. It may also occur when the person uses a substance because of group pressure, despite genuinely not wanting to do so. In this way, the individual gives in to peer pressure, crosses their own boundaries, and uses the substance.

         

The second subtype within this group is prodromal use. It may also be described as a precursor to serious health problems, whether addictive or psychiatric. These may include substance-induced psychosis in the case of cannabis, as well as depression and anxiety disorders associated with the use of dissociative substances, among other conditions that will be addressed in the corresponding chapter. As its name suggests, this type of use primarily acts as a trigger for addiction.

Prodromal use requires particular attention because it places the individual at a high risk of developing a severe addiction. This may occur, for example, when there is a history of attention-deficit disorder, personality or behavioral disorders, psychiatric conditions such as depression, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia, as well as a family history of addiction extending up to the third generation through either the paternal or maternal genetic line.

This type of use is considered prodromal because it carries a high risk of developing both an addiction and a dual diagnosis. Depending on the circumstances, this work also classifies as prodromal any use of substances with a high addictive potential, such as opioids, crack cocaine, fentanyl, and benzodiazepines. Therefore, when these substances are prescribed, the treatment plan must be followed with the utmost caution, and every effort should be made to exclude their use in individuals under the age of 25, those with a history of addiction, and those with a genetic predisposition to addictive disorders.

The use of substances with a high psychoactive potential, particularly hallucinogenic mushrooms, DMT, and LSD, is also considered prodromal because the risk of developing a secondary psychotic episode is extremely high. Any misuse of meperidine, fentanyl, or Tramal is likewise considered prodromal. In general, the misuse of any opioid, as well as the misuse of benzodiazepines—particularly alprazolam and clonazepam—is classified as prodromal use.

Examples include an anesthesiology student who tries fentanyl motu proprio, or a girl who is encouraged to try LSD at her fifteenth-birthday party, potentially causing substance-induced psychosis. Both situations are considered cases of prodromal use.

         

Abusive use represents the third subtype of risky use. This type of use should be penalized when the person engaging in it is an adult. In the case of minors, it should be detected and, at a minimum, detoxification treatment should be mandated by the authorities, as will be explained in detail in the chapter entitled “Prevention.”

This type of use must be detected and penalized because the individual endangers both themselves and, more importantly, innocent third parties by exposing them to a potential disaster. An example would be a helicopter mechanic who repairs an engine while under the influence of marijuana, after which the aircraft crashes because the mechanic failed to follow the required repair protocol. This applies to any high-risk occupation, including physicians, nurses, drivers, and operators of heavy or dangerous machinery, among others. Any use of psychoactive substances by a minor is also considered abusive because, as previously noted, the brain has not yet reached full maturity.

One reason addiction-related problems are more prevalent among young people today is that many begin using substances during adolescence. As a result, brain development and connectivity may become impaired[12]. Problematic use is characterized by public scenes, fights, conflicts, dissociative fugues[13], difficulty controlling behavior while under the influence or during substance use, and using substances alone. Solitary use is a definitive warning sign that problematic substance use may be occurring.

When a person goes out with friends as the designated driver but decides to drink, receives a fine, and nevertheless fails to recognize the seriousness of the situation and continues consuming alcohol, the use is considered problematic. In this situation, the individual endangers both their own life and the lives of others, which is highly characteristic of this type of use within the category of abusive or risky consumption.

Another defining feature is that the person continues using substances even when doing so causes personal, family, social, financial, or other problems. Consequently, significant distress or impairment develops in one or more vital areas of the individual’s life. This type of consumption is a precursor to the development of addiction.

The fourth subtype is avoidance-based use. This is a highly distinctive and dangerous form of substance use. It occurs when a person uses substances to consciously or unconsciously avoid adverse emotional states, without the substance having been prescribed by a physician. In other words, the individual attempts to escape sadness, anger, fear, guilt, pain, and other emotions through the use of psychoactive substances or absorbing behaviors that gradually become harmful. This type of use is highly prodromal, meaning that it is a strong precursor to illness. As soon as this pattern emerges, the person enters a latent stage in the development of addictive disease.

With this in mind, learning to resolve our problems is essential. Emotional regulation and control, the development of resilience, and the ability to manage emotions under pressure without relying on psychological crutches are necessary to overcome this risk and function without psychoactive substances, unless they have been prescribed by a qualified physician and are used under continuous medical supervision.

As a 19-year-old patient expressed: “Substance use postpones the emotion for me. I feel it rise, and then it comes back down” (Antonio N.A., personal communication, June 24, 2017).

It is very important to emphasize that when there is a family history of addiction or serious mental illness—such as schizophrenia, depression, suicide, or personality disorders—any substance use is highly prodromal. It is like walking across a soccer field filled with hundreds of landmines: one does not know where they are or when one will explode; it is only a matter of time.

In this situation, the appropriate choice is abstinence, because sooner or later a mine will explode, creating the risk of triggering either addiction or a mental illness encoded in the individual’s DNA and inherited from previous generations.

Pathological Substance Use

Lastly, the third category is pathological use, which represents a confused, unhealthy, and highly self-destructive pattern of behavior. The person’s body is placed at risk, their biological, psychological, and social balance is disrupted, and disorders and symptoms associated with addiction begin to emerge. As with risky use, the individual endangers both their own life and the lives of others. However, in this case, substance use becomes harmful and has severe implications not only for behavior but also for the various vital areas of the person’s life.

This type of use is difficult to manage because it progressively affects the individual’s life until it may ultimately destroy it completely. It is important to understand that substance use can develop in a manner similar to skin cancer: it begins as a small, seemingly harmless spot that gradually expands and consumes everything around it, eventually affecting the entire limb. It then metastasizes and ultimately destroys both the person suffering from it and their family. In the same way, the individual devotes increasing amounts of time to this activity until their productive life is completely abandoned.

The energy devoted to obtaining and using psychoactive substances creates an imbalance in the person’s different areas of life, including the personal, social, family, occupational, sexual, financial, and spiritual domains. This causes progressive deterioration and traps the individual in a vicious cycle in which their self-esteem and abilities gradually collapse. The person then continues using substances in an attempt to avoid or reduce the pain caused by the consequences of the use itself.

In other words, immediate pleasure eventually comes at a high cost in the medium and long term, and sometimes even during the episode of use or addictive behavior itself. There is also marked personal deterioration and a frenzy directly associated with the use. At this stage, the pattern is already a sign that an addictive disease has developed and almost always requires comprehensive treatment.

We propose six types of pathological use: iatrogenic use, continuous or chronic use, compulsive use, dissociative use, dependence-related use, and, lastly, compulsive-dissociative use.

The first type of use associated with the category of pathological use is iatrogenic use. The term is composed of the Greek root iatro, meaning “physician,” and the Greek root genos, meaning “origin” or “beginning” (DECEL, 2020). The word iatrogenic itself helps us understand that this type of use marks the beginning of an addictive problem. Iatrogenic use includes addiction unintentionally caused by medical treatment as a secondary effect of a medication originally prescribed for another purpose. Some people have developed an addiction primarily as a result of being prescribed analgesics, sleeping medications, or anxiolytics.

It is important to understand that these medications cannot be used indiscriminately, as the person may begin taking them to relieve withdrawal symptoms. This is especially common with benzodiazepine anxiolytics and analgesics, which are controlled medications that are often poorly regulated. The same may occur with certain sleep-inducing medications and pain-relief treatments: their use begins with a prescription, progresses to abuse without medical instructions, and ultimately develops into dependence-related use. Hundreds of thousands of people worldwide are affected by this pattern.

The prescription must therefore be monitored with the utmost responsibility. The professional issuing it must have clear criteria when prescribing medication whose side effects may include dependence. In addition, the patient must always be warned about its potential side effects.

The second type is continuous or chronic use, which requires particular attention because the person frequently uses a specific substance. Even when someone engaging in chronic use has not yet developed an addiction, they are very close to doing so, since nearly all psychoactive substances can cause dependence. Unfortunately, it is impossible to know exactly when addiction will be triggered. It is therefore advisable to develop responsible habits and follow the principle of avoiding psychoactive substances before the age of 25.

Anxiolytics should be used according to the principle of taking the lowest possible dose for the shortest possible period of time. This means that neither the dosage strength, the frequency of use, nor the amount of medication should be exceeded, since prolonged use may lead to the development of an addictive disorder.

This category also includes the chronic, habitual, and ongoing use of any substance. We have observed a small number of cases involving people who have consumed three alcoholic drinks every night for more than 30 years without ever exceeding that amount, causing scandals, or experiencing family problems associated with their drinking. However, they have developed physical problems affecting the liver, kidneys, and stomach.

Even when there are no serious psychological consequences, these individuals ultimately require treatment. This remains true even when their substance use has not progressively increased and the condition has remained relatively stable over time.

A particularly noteworthy case involved a woman who smoked five packets of crack cocaine every night for more than 15 years. She never exceeded that amount and lived alone, so there was no direct impact on her family. However, the paranoia caused by her substance use eventually led her to seek treatment.

She remained abstinent for more than eight years but ultimately died from pulmonary emphysema caused by tobacco use and the heavy smoke produced by crack cocaine.

         

The third type is compulsive use, which is typical of addictive disorders. In this pattern, the addicted individual responds to the mechanism of intrusive thoughts related to substance use, urges, and the addictive behavior itself. These thoughts are followed by an urge or craving.

Next comes the phase of obsessive desire to seek out the stimulus, known as searching. At this point, the person wants to use the substance again and begins strategically planning how to obtain it, until contact with the substance occurs and the addictive cycle begins once more.

This is where compulsive use comes into play: an overwhelming need to binge suddenly emerges. In other words, substance use is not moderate or controlled, but instead takes the form of a substance binge.

This type of use is often particularly harmful among adolescents, who may even take part in challenges involving inhaling enormous amounts of marijuana smoke through bongs. These pipes produce large clouds of smoke. Alcohol and funnels are also used, with peers forcing large quantities of the substance into the young person’s body. At the very least, this is extremely harmful to the brain.

Once addictive disease develops, the person begins bingeing or using compulsively on their own. Without any control or moderation, they consume a large amount of the substance within a very short period of time. Since their tolerance threshold has most likely decreased as a result of what is known as reverse tolerance, the substance rapidly overwhelms their system, causing intense drunkenness, a marijuana high, or drug-induced intoxication.

         

Dissociative use is the fourth type within the category of pathological use. It is a form of substance use in which the individual experiences a palimpsest of consciousness—that is, a mental blackout or localized amnesia accompanied by completely atypical behavior.

This condition has been studied by Dr. Magnus Huss, a researcher in the field of alcoholism, as well as by E. Morton Jellinek, who described it as a characteristic of epsilon alcoholism[14]. Other authors, such as Wilhelm Feuerlein[15] (1982), have stated that this type of use produces a true interruption of consciousness, affecting both the state of consciousness and the awareness of one’s condition. In other words, it impairs the ability to remain alert and connected to oneself and one’s surroundings, as well as the ability to distinguish between right and wrong.

In this state, the person may or may not experience anterograde amnesia[16], consisting of memory gaps in which they cannot recall what they did and undergo a complete change in behavior. In other words, they display various behaviors that are entirely inconsistent with their usual personality. Consequently, psychoactive substances may induce dissociative personality disturbances. Although this type of use may not yet constitute an addiction, it requires particular attention because the individual may be in the process of developing one.

Furthermore, since this is a pathological form of use, it is important to emphasize that certain designer drugs—particularly LSD, 2C-B, some forms of ecstasy (MDMA), and flakka—can, at substantial doses, “separate” the person from their sense of self, producing a substance-induced dissociative split. Users describe this experience as though they were floating within themselves and refer to it as a “parallel state.” In reality, it is a splitting of the individual’s consciousness from the self.

Although this type of use is pathological, it may occur in people who are not addicted. One example is an alcoholic or non-alcoholic person who has a few drinks and undergoes a complete behavioral transformation, as though experiencing a substance-induced dissociative episode.

This group also includes use associated with a medication-induced switch or pharmacokinetic switch. This occurs particularly in type III bipolar disorder, in which the ingestion of psychoactive substances triggers a manic-like or manic episode. This substance-induced pattern produces manic behavior and may be referred to as manic-like use. It is characterized by unpredictable effects on the person’s behavior, generally because an underlying type III bipolar disorder is present. In such cases, the episode persists even after the effects of the substance have worn off. This may also occur in a small number of addicted individuals with a dual diagnosis—in this case, bipolar disorder and addiction.

The fifth type, dependence-related use, is characteristic or typical of addictive disorders. When this type of use develops, the person has already established regular intervals of substance use; in other words, a habit has formed. For example, when someone smokes a cigarette every twenty minutes, the brain generates intrusive thoughts and cravings that create the need to begin the cycle again.

This situation is common among people dependent on cocaine or heroin because these substances—like many others with a high addictive potential (bonding)—produce strong cerebral dependence (kindling) in certain individuals. Dependence-related use may therefore occur during any stage of the disease: early, intermediate, or chronic. Once this form of use has developed, its chronic nature makes it virtually impossible to return to responsible use. At that point, the person is experiencing a pathological pattern of substance use.

It is important to emphasize that, in different cases of pathological use, several types may overlap within the same episode. Among the patterns we have observed, for example, is compulsive-dissociative use. In this type, the frantic nature of the substance use makes the individual appear manic, as there is a marked loss of impulse control caused by the helplessness experienced when they are unable to control their use.

This is compounded by a dissociative effect; in other words, the person practically separates from “themselves,” and their personality floats within “an isolated self,” displaying divergent behaviors that they would not normally exhibit in certain situations and would never carry out without the effects of the substance. It is important to mention that the dissociative effect also occurs among individuals in the chronic stage. In summary, this type of use combines compulsive use, the manic-like pattern typical of type III bipolar disorder, and dissociative use.

It is now possible to distinguish between responsible, risky, and pathological use. Responsible use occurs when a substance is used for experimentation, recreation, or as prescribed, without reaching excess. Risky or habitual use, by contrast, corresponds to substance abuse; it creates a habit and psychological dependence and places both the individual and others at risk. Pathological use, for its part, results from the dependence that the brain develops involuntarily, causing it to generate intrusive thoughts that drive the person to use the substance repeatedly.

As explained above, these three categories give rise to the different types of substance use under which the various patterns of consumption are classified. It is therefore important not to confuse them with the stages in the development of addictive disease, a topic that will be addressed in the following chapter. These stages refer to how addictive disease progresses once dependence-related use has developed.

 

IN CONCLUSION

It is important to emphasize that there is no such thing as safe drug use. Technically, alcohol and many “legal” substances meet the criteria for classification as drugs, and all of them carry a risk of developing substance dependence. Therefore, the pharmaceutical industry should provide less potent, safer, and less harmful substances for recreational purposes, accompanied by coherent legislation enacted by governments. All psychoactive substances produce both primary and secondary effects. Many people fail to consider the potential danger of these secondary effects, which may include addiction, psychosis, permanent brain injury, or even suicidal behavior.

We believe that a distinction should not be made between soft and hard drugs because, without knowing an individual’s biological and psychological predisposition to addiction, it is impossible to determine the repercussions that a particular substance may have on their health and life. Nevertheless, potentially dangerous drugs should be prohibited, and all psychoactive substances should be prohibited for people under the age of 25, except those prescribed by a physician.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2014). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. DSM-5. 5th Edition. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Médica Panamericana.

Bausela, E. (2014). Selective Attention Modulates Information Processing and Implicit Memory. Acción Psicológica, 11(1), 21–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/ap.1.1.13789

Costandi, M. (2016). Neuroplasticity. The MIT Press Essential Knowledge Series. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Dictionary of the Spanish Language. (2019). Iatrogenic. Royal Spanish Academy. Tricentennial Edition. 2018 Update. https://dle.rae.es/?id=cA01GWk

Online Spanish Etymological Dictionary. (2020). Gen. Retrieved from: http://etimologias.dechile.net/?gen

DICCIOMED. (2018). Prodrome. Medical-Biological, Historical, and Etymological Dictionary. University of Salamanca Press. Retrieved from: https://dicciomed.usal.es/palabra/prodromo

Encyclopaedia Britannica. (September 25, 2019). Tranquilizer. Drug. Encyclopaedia Britannica [Electronic Version]. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/science/tranquilizer

Feuerlein, W. (1982). Alcoholism: Abuse and Dependence. An Introduction for Physicians, Psychologists, and Social Workers. [Translated into Spanish from Alkoholismus-Missbrauch und Abhängigkeit]. A. Rodríguez-Martos (trans.). Barcelona, Spain: Salvat.

Freixa, F. (2002). From Drunkenness to Alcoholism: Magnus Huss, 1807–1890. Concepts Still Relevant in 2002. Revista Española de Drogodependencias, 27(2), 133–136. Retrieved from: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=305646

Fundación Función Futuro. (2017). Clinical Records of Treated Patients. Years 2006–2017. Bogotá, Colombia: Fundación Función Futuro.

González, A. A., & Matute, E. (2013). The Brain and Drugs. Mexico City, Mexico: El Manual Moderno.

Haney, M., Ward, A., Comer, S., Foltin, R., & Fischman, M. (1999). Abstinence Symptoms Following Oral THC Administration to Humans. Psychopharmacology, 141(4), 385–394.

Jellinek Memorial Awards. (n.d.). Home. Retrieved from: http://www.jellinekaward.org/

Jones, R., Benowitz, N., & Herning, R. (1981). Clinical Relevance of Cannabis Tolerance and Dependence. J Clin Pharmacol, 21(S1), 143S–152S.

Kuhar, M. (2012). A Psychodynamic Perspective on the Efficacy of 12-Step Programs. In The Addicted Brain: Why We Abuse Drugs, Alcohol, and Nicotine (pp. 216–218). Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press.

Maldonado, R. (2002). Cannabinoid Tolerance and Dependence. In Basic Guide to Cannabinoids, Spanish Society for Cannabinoid Research (SEISC) (pp. 121–133). Madrid, Spain: Complutense University of Madrid. Retrieved from: http://www.seic.es/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/guiab%C3%A1sicacannab.pdf

Oberberg-Stiftung. (n.d.). Wilhelm Feuerlein Prize. Retrieved from: http://www.oberberg-stiftung.de/wilhelm-feuerlein-preis/articles/wilhelm-feuerlein-preis-321.html

World Health Organization. (2018). International Classification of Diseases. ICD-11. Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/

Ortiz, A. J. (2008). Addiction and Eating Disorders: Unwanted Desires. Risk, Protection, and Liberation Factors through Spiritual Intelligence. Bogotá, Colombia: Proyecto Función Futuro.

Pascual, F. (2007). Anthropological Aspects of Alcoholic-Beverage Consumption in Mediterranean Cultures. Salud y Drogas, 7(2), 249–262.

Sadock, B., & Sadock, V. (2003). Kaplan & Sadock’s Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences/Clinical Psychiatry. Ninth Edition. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Stahl, S. M. (2011). Essential Psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific Basis and Clinical Applications. Updated Second Edition. Barcelona, Spain: Ariel Neurociencia.

Waisman, M., & Benabarre, A. (2017). Addictions: Psychoactive Substance Use and Clinical Presentations of Addictive Disease. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Médica Panamericana.

Weil, A., & Rosen, W. (1999). From Coffee to Morphine. Spanish Edition. Barcelona, Spain: Integral.

[1] A term proposed by the author to describe addiction to people (Ortiz, 2008).

[2] In psychology, the term behavior refers exclusively to the body’s motor actions.

[3] A term proposed by Robert Cloninger.

[4] This is the brain’s reward circuit, which is primarily governed by the neurotransmitter dopamine. It is a fundamental circuit for animal survival.

[5] The human brain reaches 80 percent of its adult size by the age of two, and its growth is nearly complete by the age of ten. However, neuroplastic changes continue beyond adolescence and early adulthood. Therefore, the brain does not reach full maturity until the mid-twenties or even later (Costandi, 2016, p. 134).

[6] At that time, water-supply systems were extremely hazardous because sewer systems and the separation of sewage from rainwater did not exist. Consequently, people living in lower areas of the mountains drank water contaminated by waste from houses in towns located farther upstream along the river. This encouraged the habitual consumption of wine and beer in Europe.

[7] THC is one of the active components of marijuana (Weil & Rosen, 1999, p. 134).

[8] CBD is an active component of the marijuana plant (Waisman & Benabarre, 2017, p. 73).

[9] An anxiolytic is a medication capable of reducing or calming anxiety, tension, and other mental states (Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2018).

[10] An alteration in a patient’s condition caused by a previously prescribed treatment that is not followed exactly as directed is also considered iatrogenic because it was produced by medical intervention (DLE, 2019).

[11] In medicine, a prodrome refers to discomfort or symptoms that precede an illness (DICCIOMED, 2018).

[12] Certain functions develop more slowly among adolescents who use substances, including executive functions (Kuhar, 2012, p. 165). Executive functions are higher-order processes necessary for planning, organizing, guiding, reviewing, regulating, and evaluating the behavior required to adapt effectively to the environment and achieve goals (Bausela, 2014, p. 22). They are also impaired in people addicted to gambling (González & Matute, 2013, p. 40).

[13] Thought that is separated or split from consciousness (Ortiz, 2008).

[14] It should be remembered that Magnus Huss was a renowned Swedish physician. He is credited with introducing the term alcoholism to refer to this disease (Freixa, 2002), as noted in the first chapter. E. M. Jellinek (1890–1963), meanwhile, was an American physiologist and biostatistician who pioneered the scientific study of the nature and causes of alcoholism and described its symptoms (Jellinek Memorial Awards, n.d.). His contributions will be discussed in greater detail in the section on alcohol.

[15] W. Feuerlein (1920–2015) was a German psychiatrist and addiction researcher. During the final decades of the twentieth century, he was regarded as a leading researcher on alcoholism in Germany and served as director of the Psychiatric Outpatient Clinic at the Max Planck Institute. His standard work, Alcoholism, Abuse and Dependence: An Introduction for Physicians, Psychologists, and Social Educators, was first published in 1975 (Oberberg-Stiftung, n.d.).

[16] This type of amnesia involves a complete or partial inability to retain ongoing experiences in memory. In other words, the experiences do not become part of long-term memory and are forgotten after only a few minutes or seconds (Sadock & Sadock, 2003, p. 286).

CHAPTER THREE

PHASES OF THE DISEASE

Testimonial 3

“My life was madness. I had episodes involving alcohol and cocaine every three or four days. I would appear calm, and then thoughts of using would bombard me. This produced tremendous anxiety that ultimately drove me, like a powerful force, to use again. During the episode, the pleasure had disappeared; everything was chaotic, an indescribable frenzy. Once I finally managed to sleep after the episode, depression and an overwhelming sense of worthlessness would follow. Before long, the anxiety to use would begin again. That was how I lived, trapped in hellish cycles. Today I understand why: because my brain was ill and wanted stimulation, because I had developed addictive disease.”

Jhon X, patient. (Fundación Función Futuro, 2008)

FROM THE LATENT TO THE CHRONIC STATE

In this chapter, we will address the phases of the disease that develop from prodromal use, which in itself creates a state of heightened vulnerability to the development of addictive disease. When prodromal use occurs frequently, it can be understood as progressing toward addictive disease through three phases. As previously explained, the process begins with a latent state, which may be described not so much as a phase but as a preaddictive condition, from which the early, critical, and chronic phases are triggered. Each of these follows a characteristic and defined course.

When prodromal use becomes dependence-related use, a need for stimulation has already emerged, and addictive disease begins. It then progresses through stages marked by increasing substance use and deterioration in the individual and their social environments. These phases arise from the European studies of Magnus Huss, who researched alcoholism among people in France, Russia, and the Scandinavian Peninsula. Alcoholism was the first addiction to be recognized as a disease.

These descending and ascending phases or curves can also be applied to other addictions and must be taken into account because addiction, as a chronic and progressive disease, follows a characteristic course. Although variations occur depending on the substance or addictive behavior involved, these phases reveal a set of clearly defined patterns. They are described below on the basis of observations of hundreds of people treated and studied by the Función Futuro team, considered in light of various theoretical approaches and the accounts of people affected by addictive disease.

It is important to clarify that during the early and intermediate phases of the disease, the individual begins to develop tolerance[1] to the substance or to the specific neurotransmitter released by the addictive behavior. As tolerance develops, the person must increasingly stimulate the nervous system and consume more and more to achieve the same effect. During the advanced phases, tolerance thresholds become progressively lower; this is known as reverse tolerance. However, the body has become accustomed to the release of large quantities of specific brain chemicals and becomes dysregulated through the mechanism of anticipatory depletion. This is known as neuronal adaptation to the stimulus and generally persists for a considerable time after the last episode of use.

In conclusion, the brain adapts to substance use and establishes connections that consciously and unconsciously repeat the ritual of the addictive behavior. For this reason, many people with addiction state that they use against their own will. This can be explained by the triggering, at a certain point, of the neurological event associated with the disease. At this stage, the person no longer uses solely for pleasure, but also to escape the tension and anxiety caused by withdrawal. Initially, use is driven mainly by the pursuit of pleasure, or positive reinforcement. During the intermediate phases, it is driven by both pleasure and relief from anxiety, or dual reinforcement. In the most advanced phases, it is driven mainly by the need to reduce withdrawal-related anxiety, or negative reinforcement.

It is essential to understand these phases of development and the latent or preaddictive state. Because this is a chronic disease—that is, a condition that remains permanently present in the individual—its progression and deterioration may be halted through abstinence, but the underlying condition remains chronic. Like most chronic diseases, it may respond appropriately to three types of intervention: primary intervention, involving prevention and intervention during the latent or preaddictive state; secondary intervention, once the neurological component has emerged; and tertiary intervention, involving relapse prevention after secondary treatment. It must also be understood that there are essentially three developmental components, in addition to a spiritual component, because few diseases affect a sufferer’s values and will to the same extent.

The three primary components are biological, understood as addictive kindling; psychological, involving the psychological predisposition and the characteristics addressed in Part Two; and social, which is explained in the corresponding chapter. These components are clearly present during the latent state, are triggered in the first phase, and many of their features persist and intensify as the disease progresses.

It is very important to understand the terms craving, primary priming, secondary priming, and bonding. Cravings are urges that cause a person to lose control over abstinence; the anxiety becomes so intense that, only a few days after committing to abstinence, the addicted person uses again. Primary priming is the substance’s potential to trigger repeated dosing, resulting in a loss of control over use. Secondary priming is the potential for another substance to be used while under the effects of the first. Bonding is the potential of a substance to produce addiction. These phenomena intensify as the disease advances.

PHASES OF ADDICTIVE DISORDERS

In modern times, Magnus Huss (Campos, 1999, para. 5) and E. M. Jellinek[2], renowned researchers of alcohol addiction, pioneered the study of the disease by describing the phases of alcoholism (WHO, 1954, p. 25) and the types of alcoholic disease, which differ from the types of substance use. The phases of the disease describe how risky and prodromal use progress toward pathological use, and how dependence-related use advances through progressive phases, each with clearly defined characteristics.

Because addiction is a disease that encompasses such diverse areas, behaviors, and substances, the phases described below must be adapted to the specific addictive behavior or substance involved. Even so, certain patterns can be applied to all types of addiction, particularly those involving psychoactive substances. According to statistics compiled by Fundación Función Futuro, addiction to psychoactive substances is the most common: approximately 75 out of every 100 patients seek treatment for addiction to such substances (2017). Many aspects of addictive diseases must be reconsidered and rewritten because patterns of use, the age of initiation, and the addictive and psychoactive potency of substances have changed considerably over time. It is therefore essential to consider the current reality and examine these phases as described here in order to improve prevention, intervention, and postvention[3]—interventions carried out after intensive treatment has achieved positive symptom reduction—in the field of addiction.

We emphasize the need to understand that this disease, which has always existed, was long viewed through a biased lens as a “vice” or a “mania for becoming intoxicated.” This prevented it from receiving adequate attention through clinical research. Today, we know that addiction is neither a moral deviation nor an emotional deficiency. It is a disease like any other and can affect people regardless of race, gender, creed, socioeconomic status, or intellectual ability. It should be understood as a condition that may occur and that can be successfully prevented and treated.

The content of this chapter must be adapted to both substance dependence and addictive behaviors. Unlike obsessive-compulsive disorders (OCD) and manias, addictive behaviors, dependencies, and non-chemical addictive disorders involve the overstimulation of brain chemicals consistently associated with pleasure—particularly dopamine—or an overload of the dopaminergic circuit. In OCD, irrational repetitive behaviors are carried out to relieve anxiety; for example, compulsive handwashing may occur in response to the anxiety caused by obsessive thoughts of becoming infected. In the case of manias, there is a clear impairment of impulse control and the presence of inappropriate and irrational behaviors, such as pyromania, dromomania, kleptomania, and toxic-substance manias[4], among other recognized manias. However, these individuals are not seeking an overload of the dopaminergic circuit. Addiction therefore should not be described as drug mania or as an OCD condition. Nevertheless, when these antecedents are combined with substance use, they become prodromal risk factors that require close attention to prevent the development of addiction.

Eating disorders and certain personality disorders share many psychological signs and symptoms with addictions. For this reason, non-chemical addictions and eating disorders can also be understood through the progressive phases or curves that describe the psychological deterioration caused by the disease, as outlined below.

Preadictive or Prodromal Phase

This phase is so named because the person focuses attention on matters carrying a high risk of addiction, minimizing their harmful nature while maximizing their euphoric promise of well-being. This may trigger the disease when combined with an environment in which substances or behaviors are readily offered, genetic risk factors—including a family history of addiction and psychiatric problems—and an attitude favorable to use. The person denies the often devastating consequences of use, justifies experimental behaviors, and greatly idealizes the practice or substance. In many cases, initial use occurs under peer pressure and because the person has a limited sense of personal power when establishing boundaries.

Nearly all experimental use begins with a desire to fit in or belong to a particular social group that has been idealized as a source of affiliation and acceptance. Among people in recovery who have achieved abstinence, this latent phase remains for life, even when they maintain high-quality abstinence. Cigarette addiction is a clear example. At approximately 60 years of age, the brain may erase the connections associated with compulsive use, habit, and dependence; however, even after five years of abstinence, if the person smokes an entire pack again, they may fall back into the grip of the disease. According to what we have documented during 30 years of research, the same applies to addictions involving other substances and behaviors. This is why people with addiction say, “It is the first dose after a period of abstinence that causes the harm.” They also say that “a thousand doses after the first will never be enough” and therefore that “the first is always already too much.”

This phase may also involve dangerous avoidance-based use intended to escape one’s personal reality or the family and social environment in which one lives. The person accepts preaddictive behaviors as a means of escaping reality or seeking new sensations. Some have called this the enchantment or “honeymoon” stage, during which the substance or behavior is heavily idealized. Some beginners even assign a magical or mythical meaning to the ritual of use or to the preaddictive or prodromal behavior. Many people experiment with substances or behaviors, and some eventually become addicted, depending on the extent to which they deny the risk, justify further use, and overidealize the activity or substance.

The disease thus begins with the “siren song,” an analogy that aptly represents what occurs with drugs, other addictive behaviors, and even certain eating disorders (Ortiz, 2008, p. 46). Until the disease—in this case, an obsession with use—becomes anchored in the person’s mind, the individual remains in a preaddictive or prodromal phase. Once obsessive use or behavior emerges, with excessive preoccupation, use at inappropriate times and places, and an inability to stop for sustained periods[5], the disease itself begins, its development accelerates, and the person enters the early phase.

It is important to note that the person is not yet addicted but is prone to developing an addiction. As stated previously, “not everyone who drinks alcohol is an alcoholic, and not everyone who uses drugs is a drug addict.” Nevertheless, when use becomes problematic, it is necessary to determine whether the person has difficulty stopping. This requires an assessment of the person’s ability to maintain abstinence, to stop easily once use has begun, and to control their behavior after becoming engaged in the addictive practice or ritual. These difficulties arise under the powerful influence of deceptive promises of inner fulfillment that, in reality, subject the person to overwhelming excess and loss of self-governance.

The following expands on a passage from Homer’s Odyssey (Spanish trans., 1987). The main character is Odysseus, also known as Ulysses. As he returns home to Ithaca after the Trojan War, he and his crew pass an island inhabited by a goddess and sorceress named Circe, who forces them to remain there. She instructs Ulysses on how to pass the island of the Sirens without dying. The Sirens “sang such beautiful songs” that they lured sailors toward the cliffs, where their ships crashed, so that the Sirens could kill and eat them. Ulysses wanted to hear their magnificent songs, so he ordered his crew to tie him to the ship’s mast and to place wax in their own ears so they could not hear the Sirens’ seductive singing.

In this story, the Sirens’ songs represent the temptations of a substance or behavior—the attractions and false promises of well-being that may lead a person toward the ferocity of addiction. This is how addiction begins during the preaddictive or prodromal phase. Young people are inherently attracted to risk, and it is precisely here that these siren songs create confusion. By presenting risks as manageable, they entice young people to accept them, often with negative consequences. The person’s sense of certainty and awareness of consequences are also impaired.

Prodromal use is not always present during the latent state. The person may simply be in a preaddictive phase or stage, with or without current use, because they are potentially prone to developing addiction. Prodromal use may be absent in the latent state or phase, particularly in cases involving attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, personality disorders, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. Because of their psychological characteristics, such individuals may already be at substantial risk of developing addiction and, consequently, dual pathology[6].

The progression of this phase toward addiction is related to the person’s poor management of endogenous enabling factors, such as attitudes favorable to use, the social environment, and heredity. It is also influenced by exogenous factors, including dysfunctional families, friends, and society itself with its false stereotypes. The inability to work through problems, together with the failure to establish constructive boundaries that protect personal growth in every area of life, increases the risk of triggering severe addiction. Irrational beliefs must therefore be eliminated, including personal ideologies claiming that psychoactive substances are harmless, that one is immune to the depths into which others have fallen, or that these behaviors relieve existential suffering. Such immediate, fleeting, and temporary pleasures ultimately demand a high price: future well-being.

Other influences on the development of the disease are biological factors, including the addictive power of the substance or behavior[7] and the person’s organic resistance[8] to that addictive power. Drugs therefore do not affect everyone in the same way, nor are addictive behaviors equally pleasurable for all people. As previously explained, environmental factors, psychological position, genetic predisposition, and organic resistance shape a person’s vulnerability or hypersensitivity to a specific form of pleasure and, consequently, the likelihood of developing addiction.

Because an individual’s resistance to a drug is unknown, the most coherent choice is not to become “hooked,” since many people are trapped from the first dose. In purging-type anorexia and bulimia, the initial illusion of well-being accompanies the binge. Although vomiting may appear to “improve the situation” and “temporarily dissipate anxiety,” the anxiety later intensifies. Restriction produces a sense of control and may even seem to create an attractive figure; however, this is an illusion. Dysmorphophobia[9] appears, and vomiting is used once again in an attempt to feel better. In both addictive and eating disorders, these situations begin in a latent phase or state that requires close attention. Because these diseases are chronic, they respond well to specific primary care, with comprehensive programs offering the best approach.

Although the disease can develop at any age, the most vulnerable stages are those during which character is formed: childhood, preadolescence, and adolescence. Certain emotional patterns can be recognized as factors leading an individual toward addictive behavior. Early substance use generally reflects an exaggerated search for acceptance and recognition. Other factors include impulsivity, a demand for immediate gratification, low frustration tolerance or limited resilience thresholds[10], lack of self-acceptance, difficulty adapting, disproportionate emotional responses to pleasant or unpleasant external stimuli, emotional chaos, limited ability to overcome adversity, an extremely defensive attitude, resistance to suggestions, attitudes of superiority or inferiority toward others resulting from distorted self-concept, tendencies toward avoidance and denial, a sense of either insufficient or excessive personal power, identification with stereotypes of addicted people, hypersensitivity to pleasure, negative family examples, difficulty respecting and establishing boundaries (Ortiz, 2008, p. 47), and the proliferation of primary defenses (see the psychological aspects discussed in Part Two).

When these characteristics are combined with limited humility, an inability to follow guidance, little perseverance, an ideology favorable to addictive practices, and an absence of reasonable limits, the development of the disease becomes easier. Adding substance use may produce an addicted individual within a short time. It should also be remembered that the misuse of any addictive behavior or substance substantially increases the possibility of developing the disease, particularly before the age of 25, when full neurobiological development or maturity is reached.

Although the obsessive-compulsive phenomenon has not yet appeared during this phase, the preaddictive individual can be recognized by marked impulsivity across many areas of life and notable anomie[11]. Low self-esteem is particularly important and is almost always accompanied by a basic anxiety in which the person fears not being good enough or sufficiently adequate. During 30 years of observation, we have seen that these features, when combined with any type of substance use, frequently propel a person toward addiction. Most experimental use occurs because of peer pressure and the desire to “shine” or gain recognition, to demonstrate an ability to transgress limits, or to earn the group’s respect and avoid being considered a nerd[12]. It may also arise from spiritual, emotional, and social erosion (Ortiz, 2008, p. 47), preceded by this underlying anxiety.

Consequently, the person begins engaging in recurrent and obsessive addictive behaviors and becomes attached through the substance’s bonding potential[13], losing their sense of reality in interaction with the individual’s kindling vulnerability[14]. The preaddictive person is therefore playing with the extremely serious danger of triggering addiction. Vigilance is necessary to prevent further descent along the course of the disease. An ideology favorable to addictive practices becomes an especially serious risk factor because it allows the disease to progress.

When a close family member has experienced addiction, great caution is required to prevent later addictive situations. It should be remembered that 50 percent of addictions are transmitted genetically (Fonseca, 2017; Sáiz, García-Portilla, Paredes, Bascarán, & Bobes, 2009; Volkow, 2014), while the remainder are attributed to abuse or excessive exposure (Fundación Función Futuro, 2017a). Healthy communication—both in the manner in which a message is delivered and in its content—is therefore essential, as is making the family member feel important and validated. Clear boundaries against substance use, reinforced through example, affection, and support, are equally important and strengthen protective factors.

During the phase of experimental use or behavior, it may become apparent that the preaddictive individual is devoting progressively more time to thinking about using or obtaining substances. Performance, discipline, and commitment to responsibilities consequently decline. The person reaches the critical point of this phase—the peak from which they are propelled into the early phase—when denial begins: “I use them, but I do not need them,” or “I control them.” In contrast to an addicted person, someone with strong levels of acceptance and adaptability does not require a substance or self-destructive behavior to achieve pleasure, personal security, well-being, acceptance from people who truly matter, or a legitimate sense of self-fulfillment.

Fertile ground for the development of this phase is created by poor personal management of precipitating factors, facilitators, and triggers. Precipitating factors are people, places, and situations that cause distress or open the way to substance use and a social narrative favorable to it. Facilitators are those who offer the substance or behavior. Triggers include more than the personal attitudes represented by psychological defenses; they also include irrational thoughts and beliefs that protect or justify substance use or the behavior.

When the family environment creates internal distress, or when family events leave a profound mark on the individual—such as adoption, tyrannical or overprotective parents, parents prone to abandonment or excessive absence, and other family and social circumstances to be addressed in the corresponding chapter—the risk of addiction rises substantially, particularly when avoidance-based use is added as a means of escaping reality. It is therefore essential to develop a strong awareness of consequences by learning from the experiences of others and evaluating the future risks of one’s own actions.

Lastly, sensitivity to the offerings of a hostile and substance-promoting environment encourages and facilitates the disease when a person’s principal self-schemas are insufficiently developed. These include self-knowledge, self-acceptance, self-control, autonomy, and self-esteem. Weakness in these areas, combined with psychological predisposition, may allow the addictive gene to be triggered in the preaddictive individual. Substance use then arises not only through experimentation but also through avoidance and an inability to resolve personal conflicts within one’s reality. This is reflected in the search for highly euphoric behaviors that absorb the individual. Such behaviors are used to compensate for feelings of nonexistence, insecurity, existential emptiness, and either insufficient or excessive personal power, rather than turning to constructive influences on personality, such as healthy and moderate activities including study, sports, reading, outdoor activities, quality films, religious activities, and others.

In any person, the development of the disease may be triggered by a genetic history of addiction, severe tension with parents, conflict within the inner self, or personality-disorder traits combined with substance use. The risk is especially high when the person is under 25 and experiences episodes of brain overstimulation through drug misuse, food binges, or vomiting to expel unwanted food.

Vomiting produces a surge of neurotransmitters in the brain and reflects a highly irrational habit that is discussed more extensively in the section on eating disorders. When substance use is combined with traits of depression, psychosis, suicidal ideation, or bipolar disorder, the behavior is also classified as risky practice during the prodromal phase.

Other factors that may make an individual prodromally addicted include a genetic history of addiction extending to the third generation, cluster personality disorders, sexual abuse, anxiety disorders, bipolar affective disorder, schizophrenia, and depression, among others, when any of these conditions is combined with substance use or abusive or compulsive behaviors aimed at intoxication or narcosis. The risk is particularly high when these behaviors occur before the age of 25. As stated repeatedly, experimental use after the age of 25 is less likely to develop into addiction, except when a genetic component is present.

Many people, particularly young people, enter treatment during this phase. Although they are not yet addicted, their families may become concerned about visible signs of excess and deterioration and arrange treatment. This decision must be carefully considered because, if the young person is not taken to a high-quality rehabilitation setting, they may imitate negative behaviors and learn precisely what they should not learn. The center should provide highly individualized care and specific primary-prevention services. A widespread myth in prisons and behavioral treatment centers is that minors should never receive treatment alongside adults. When care is highly personalized, however, it may even be beneficial for a preaddictive person—often a minor—to be treated with older individuals, whose experiences can provide examples, testimony, and positive modeling in an environment deeply committed to recovery.

Early Phase

The early phase of the disease begins at the precise moment when addictive kindling is triggered. The brain has already undergone changes and begins producing a conscious or unconscious need for stimulation. This phase is characterized by a gradual increase in tolerance levels or thresholds for the substance, behavior, or addictive practice. Because the damage is almost imperceptible, the addicted person begins denying the harm that has already developed, avoiding prolonged periods of abstinence, and creating justifications to protect and arrange future contact with the substance or behavior.

From this phase onward, the addicted person experiences pleasure during contact with the addictive stimulus while simultaneously feeling distress upon realizing that the “addictive episode” is about to end (Ortiz, 2008, p. 48). The first signs of withdrawal appear, along with what we have called the consequence syndrome: clearly marked fear, anxiety, guilt, pain, and sadness arising as a rebound effect after the episode. As the brain becomes dysregulated, it increasingly operates through a mechanism of anticipatory depletion. In other words, during the addictive episode, the brain exhausts the neurotransmitters that create feelings of well-being and pleasure. Even so, use during this phase is driven mainly by positive reinforcement—that is, the person frantically seeks the pleasure created by stimulation. Use intended to relieve withdrawal-related anxiety is not yet the dominant pattern, although it is already present.

During this phase, the quantity, frequency, and potency of the substance or behavior increase and become extremely pleasurable because the brain is flooded with dopamine. These episodes distract the person from confronting and resolving their own reality and draw them away from the sense of purpose and life plan established before entering this phase. The addicted individual feels chemically—but not genuinely—fulfilled and idealizes the substance use. Priming[15] toward other substances frequently occurs at this stage.

In cases of drug addiction, the person experiences great pleasure when possessing a large quantity of the preferred substance and simultaneously fears being without it. When sober during this stage, the addicted person longs for and plans the next episode of use. Compulsive eaters begin anticipating the taste of food and repeatedly savoring it mentally before consuming it in a binge. Poor management of precipitating factors, particularly family situations, leads the person to adopt behaviors that help them escape their own reality. This is where obsession and the planning of “intense but controlled episodes” begin.

At this stage, the addicted person begins losing the capacity for self-criticism—that is, the ability to evaluate themselves and their actions accurately. Conscious and unconscious self-deception increases and becomes part of the denial of the disease. Clear deterioration therefore begins during this phase: the greater the denial, the further the disease progresses. The person’s powerlessness in the face of the behavior also becomes more evident as the obsession with use or the addictive practice grows. Family members and other close contacts begin to criticize the person (Ortiz, 2008, p. 49), normal habits are gradually abandoned, and the addictive ritual or episode becomes increasingly frequent and intense.

In addition, some individuals show the clear emergence of what are known as cross-tolerances. The person begins experimenting with different substances, either separately or layered onto the original drug. Priming is particularly evident when one substance immediately stimulates the desire for another. For example, drinking alcohol may create the urge to smoke cigarettes, as may the combination of cocaine and alcohol. Such cross-tolerances ultimately impair the body’s ability to resist toxic substances. In some cases, the person becomes addicted to two, three, or even four different substances. In primary priming, the substance has the potential—depending on the individual’s addiction—to cause the dose to be repeated compulsively again and again.

Each phase or stage is marked by specific indicators. Just as the preaddictive state is generally characterized by low self-esteem and, in many cases, a distorted sense of self-importance, the early phase is marked by the beginning of a loss of self-control that persists throughout the development of the disease. We have essentially observed the deterioration of three forms of control: the ability to maintain abstinence after promising oneself not to use again; the ability to control the impulse to continue once the addictive episode has begun; and the ability to control behavior while under the influence. These losses correspond to what self-help groups describe as powerlessness. During this initial phase, the person loses personal control over the substance or addictive behavior. Addiction has been born.

The first compulsions occur during this stage, although initially only on occasional occasions. The addicted person may be unable to stop using or performing the behavior, or may simply use in inappropriate situations and become socially inappropriate, marking the beginning of social degradation. The person arranges circumstances that favor the behavior and superficially rejects the suggestion that there is a problem. Denial consequently allows the disease to continue progressing. The individual also supports the behavior with apparently rational arguments used to defend the abandonment of good habits, recreational and family activities, spiritual practices, school, university, sports, work, or healthy friendships.

A process of neglecting personal appearance begins. In some cases, particularly those involving substance use, the person develops a preference for atypical clothing. By this phase, the addicted individual has formed a core group of facilitators, including friends who use substances and dealers, who immerse them in the subculture of use. Depending on the substance, the person gradually adopts personality roles that are not authentic.

As the person begins this self-destructive path and disregards advice from those who point out their mistakes, they become involved with others in the same condition to avoid feeling marginalized by emerging behavior that is typically asocial[16] and, in certain cases, antisocial[17]. The person begins to lose contact with social peers and develops relationships with individuals who do not correspond to their previous social and cultural background. In some cases of drug use, the person becomes dangerously involved in the dark underworld of street-level drug dealing and, in others, in crime or subcultures involving drugs and dangerous, unhealthy sexual behavior. This clearly reflects a departure from primary goals and serious damage to the person’s sense of purpose, as the psychoactive power of the substance distorts interpretations of both personal reality and the surrounding environment.

During this phase, the affected person does not recognize the significant changes occurring in the mind because of substance use, nor its impact on friendships, life plans, personal appearance, and, in certain cases, moral and ethical decisions. The self-destructive process begins. The individual reshapes their social environment downward to protect behavior that degrades personal ethics and moral principles, because they feel less criticized or rejected in lower social circles. Responsibility is gradually lost, and the person fails to fulfill academic, family, occupational, and social commitments.

Throughout this phase, use generally takes place in groups, and the person believes they remain in control of the substance or behavior and of their normal life. Some call this phase the “honeymoon,” while others call it the “pink cloud.” Biological damage may not yet be visible, although the behavior becomes anchored mentally and emotionally. Negative effects then begin to appear, including irritability, emotional instability, withdrawal from previously healthy social environments, and erosion across different areas of development. At the neurological level, connections begin to form as the brain interprets dopamine overstimulation as a reward. Strong conscious and unconscious cravings then arise in an effort to recreate the episode.

Character defects intensify during this phase, while the individual’s virtues and inner values decline. The sense of belonging is severely affected; friends may be viewed as enemies, and conflicts arise with family members. The sense of ownership and regard for personal possessions also erodes. A substantial portion of the person’s money is used to pay for the addiction. Excessive spending, partying with inappropriate people, unwanted sexual encounters, and, in some cases, the first acts of deception and theft occur. A particularly noticeable feature is the increased ability and willingness to lie in order to protect the substance use. The sense of consequence and certainty also deteriorates further. As conscience—the ability to recognize and act upon what is right and wrong—is affected, the person begins to assign negative meaning to what is good and positive meaning to what is harmful. Unless this stops, the descent will continue, accompanied by further justification or denial of the deterioration and decline through irrational meanings and constructs.

Tolerance thresholds begin adapting to increasing use because the body requires larger doses to obtain the same effect and calm the cravings. Most heavy users, including those able to tolerate large quantities without an immediate visible problem, are found at this stage. These individuals generally carry a significant personal supply, unlike social users who consume only circumstantially. Because the damage is not yet highly visible, the addicted person may believe they are invulnerable and develop an arrogant, irresponsible, and reckless attitude toward use.

The self-destructive behavior makes the person feel “fulfilled”; however, this fulfillment is not genuine because it is chemically produced. Disregard for commitments and the loss of control over uncomfortable, extreme, and intense feelings become increasingly evident. This produces problems with communication, adaptation, and commitment to responsibilities as a child, parent, professional, student, and ultimately as a citizen. Post-use pain begins to appear, accompanied by guilt and shame for failing to seek healthy sources of pleasure and for the scenes or abnormal events that occur during the addictive episode.

During the early phase, the addicted person begins mismanaging time and money. When personal effort could be used to build a better future, the person instead devotes time to sources offering fleeting and apparent well-being. The end of this phase can be recognized when the person begins sacrificing personal possessions to cover the costs of addiction, loans, or debts, or frantically seeks money and resources by selling or exchanging personal belongings in order to use the substance or engage in the behavior (Ortiz, 2008, p. 50).

The difficulty of stopping becomes evident near the end of this phase. The person occasionally begins promising others and themselves that there will be “no more,” yet returns to the same behavior within days. Dysfunctional personality traits and maladaptive patterns become more pronounced. Some individuals increasingly isolate themselves, while others become excessively social. Emotional instability and hostility toward anyone who criticizes the substance use become unmistakable. People with anxious temperaments adopt addictive practices as a way of life to dissipate their anxiety. Although this phase may not yet be highly painful for the individual, it is painful for those close to them. Some people begin recovery during this phase and thereby avoid more serious problems.

Intermediate or Critical Phase

Identifying the disease becomes much easier during this phase because tolerance thresholds reach their broadest range. The person requires a large quantity of the substance to feel satisfied. In behavioral addiction, the addictive practice breaks through all of the individual’s limits (Ortiz, 2008, p. 50). Because of the pain and harm already caused, the addicted person begins promising and wishing not to repeat the behavior, usually without success.

Coping structures such as autonomy, self-esteem, and self-control undergo clear deterioration. Stability across the major areas of life is similarly compromised. The person’s autonomy declines while substantial dependence on the substance or addictive behavior develops, accompanied by morning episodes, solitary excesses, and use at inappropriate times. Dual-reinforcement use appears during this phase: the person uses both to seek pleasure, or positive reinforcement, and to reduce the anxiety caused by withdrawal, or negative reinforcement.

People with emotional or social ties to the affected individual notice the abnormal behavior with confusion and may believe that the addicted person has lost sound judgment. They respond according to their own criteria and understanding of the disease and may become either facilitators or obstacles to the addiction (Ortiz, 2008, p. 51). When the family responds appropriately, it helps the person enter treatment. Otherwise, family members may isolate or marginalize the person physically or emotionally, which produces worse results.

Family members who become precipitating factors or facilitators in the development of addiction generally do not understand that, with appropriate treatment, the affected person can resolve cravings and “work through” difficult situations without using again. No one other than the individual ultimately pulls the trigger that initiates another episode. It is essential to emphasize that the family must not facilitate the disease, although it can promote and support recovery. In some cases, however, when the person continues denying the problem and rejects help, separation may be appropriate until they reach a crisis point and accept assistance.

As a result of the loss of control over the disease, the time and resources devoted to use—including money and personal energy—steadily increase. Repeated failures to meet responsibilities emerge as the disease advances. The addictive behavior is used to relieve tension and escape reality, or at least part of it. Character defects, such as aggression toward those who provide affection, become more evident. At this stage, the affected person is clearly becoming a victim of their own defects and excesses. Selfishness, dishonesty, pride, grandiosity, self-indulgence, and continual justification are simply defenses of the disease or immature ways of coping with reality.

Symptoms such as obsessiveness reflect personality deterioration. The problem involves not only the time devoted to the addiction but also the amount of time spent thinking about it. Marked deterioration occurs in occupational, financial, and family life, and a large share of the individual’s financial resources is used to cover the costs of the addiction.

Certain psychological complexes and syndromes appear or intensify, becoming a psychological crutch used to carry out the addictive practice as though it were necessary for survival and to avoid confronting personal fears, sorrows, shame, guilt, and pain. During this phase, the day-after syndrome, or consequence syndrome following an episode of use or addictive behavior, is marked by unwanted conduct and characterized by fear, remorse, and guilt. Its effects are resolved by passing through withdrawal without using again. With prolonged abstinence, the consequence syndrome disappears entirely, provided that effective restructuring work addresses thoughts and beliefs, feelings, affections, and attachments. In other words, the person must learn how to think, how to believe, how to love, and above all, how to feel.

The addicted person becomes highly sensitive and is easily hurt, responding with anger or episodes described as “depression.” Self-destructive behaviors emerge, including self-pity and repeated addictive practices. In cases involving substances, blackouts and episodes of geographical disorientation are frequent. Parties or binges lasting more than one day also occur with some frequency, sometimes referred to as runflas.

In both behavioral and substance addictions, the need for money becomes so great that, in nearly every case, the person resorts to loans that will not be repaid, deception of others, or even criminal conduct such as theft—first within the family and later against others—to cover the costs of the disease (Ortiz, 2008, p. 51). Violations of personal morality become evident. During this phase, the sense of existential orientation and direction, the individual’s life project, and the meaning of life itself gradually dissolve into fantasy.

Unwanted desires and thoughts become increasingly intense. Control over personal spaces, time, and possessions is severely impaired. When the person is not using, they are planning the next episode or addictive behavior. Re-stimulation has a powerful effect during this phase: the addicted person becomes powerless before certain people, situations, objects, and places associated with use or the addictive practice and therefore initiates new cycles. Distractibility and poor academic or occupational performance become dominant. The person repeatedly commits acts contrary to family and social upbringing, behaving “insanely” under the influence of a force that exceeds willpower and self-control. Sound judgment begins to disappear, and the person ends up in places and circumstances they never imagined experiencing (Ortiz, 2008, p. 52).

Degradation, irritability, manipulation, opportunism, apathy, contempt for healthy activities, arrogant and defiant conduct, and lying are among the tools used during this stage to protect the pleasure of engaging in the addictive practice, although at an extremely high cost to quality of life and well-being. The person in this phase is described as critical because most episodes produce a crisis. In the case of cannabis, for example, these may be motivational crises accompanied by substantial deterioration in cognitive abilities.

The person experiences withdrawal crises, and life begins to dissolve amid continued use, producing deep frustration. Resilience declines, and the threshold for frustration is greatly reduced. Tolerance for criticism, rejection, harassment, and similar experiences reaches very low levels, deepening sadness and pain and encouraging further use to escape these emotional realities. Substance use or addictive behavior then becomes a way of life that absorbs increasing amounts of time, energy, and both inner and outward values.

Under these circumstances, people with alcoholism frequently create disturbing scenes, while people addicted to cocaine may spend two or three days isolated and using, generally in motels or brothels. In the case of analgesics, whether taken in drops or injected, doses become enormous because tolerance has reached its highest point. The same occurs with other psychoactive substances. Doses may become so high that they would severely intoxicate or even kill a person without tolerance. The end of this phase is identified by the onset of reverse tolerance: the previous ability to withstand large quantities disappears, and smaller doses rapidly produce an effect. This marks the beginning of the chronic phase.

At the end of this phase, the dopamine discharge is accompanied by pleasure followed by increasingly intense post-use pain, guilt, and feelings of agony. In opposition to their cultural, moral, and material heritage, the addicted person pays for continued use—not only with material possessions. The person may be willing to end up alone, dispossessed, and humiliated in order to maintain contact with the addictive behavior and therefore begins choosing solitary use. They become irritable and almost unreachable when addiction is discussed. Loss of self-control becomes so severe that personal belongings may be sold to pay the material costs of the addiction. Other people are exploited through deception, theft, and broken promises. Accidents and legal problems frequently occur, along with incongruent and irresponsible behavior that pushes the individual into positions of progressively lower responsibility. Existential dynamics consequently deteriorate. Quality of life declines until, unless denial and avoidance end, the person may enter a psychiatric clinic or recovery center, become homeless, go to prison, or die. In every case, the individual becomes stigmatized and excluded from opportunities to develop integral values (Ortiz, 2008, p. 52).

Many so-called problem users are found in this phase—people whose use almost always results in difficulties or scandals. The end of this stage is also marked by solitary use or behavior and the complete loss of control during an episode, which is well recognized in substance-misuse cases. The phase reaches its conclusion when the person deceives and even steals, or pawns belongings to finance the addiction. At this point, serious problems arise from antisocial behavior within the family or on the street, and the individual begins entering detention facilities or addiction-treatment centers. Legal detention may also occur. Most people who ultimately recover begin their recovery through the humble acceptance of this phase and by responsibly embracing their commitment to life (Ortiz, 2008, p. 53).

Chronic Phase

During this stage, the sustained sensation of pleasure throughout the dopamine-release episode has almost entirely disappeared. Use is driven far more by negative reinforcement—relieving anxiety—than by the search for pleasurable stimulation, or positive reinforcement. An intense, frantic, and very brief effect is experienced only at the beginning of the pleasure discharge. The remainder consists of frenzy and a desire to consume more and more, varying with the substance and the pattern of use developed by the individual. Pleasure is felt only at the beginning. The habit is so powerful that behavior is governed more by addictive automatism than by personal will, accompanied by an overwhelming need to continue the addictive practice. Anxiety and anguish become so intense that, in some cases involving drugs, the effects appear even before the addictive behavior begins (Ortiz, 2008, p. 53).

Physical or verbal aggression against anyone attempting to prevent use also intensifies. The affected person irrationally believes that a new cycle will produce different results and that behavior will be controlled during the next desired occasion. Sooner or later, this error leads back to the same depths the person wishes to avoid. They continue using in the hope of finding the pleasure experienced in earlier phases, although it has already disappeared. The person feels sorry for themselves and betrays their own ideals because of the speed with which deterioration follows use. Examples include an older adult who forges a medical prescription to obtain sedatives, a gambler who defrauds the family, a person addicted to drugs who begs in the street, or a person with alcoholism who lies unconscious in a bar or on the floor at home. These situations are highly similar: all are driven by a disintegrating force[18] that exceeds the person’s own will and compels them to violate their integrity in order to satisfy the destructive force called addiction (Rosabel Soler, personal communication, 2000).

As noted, tolerance increased during the previous phase. In the chronic phase, however, tolerance begins to decline rapidly as soon as it has reached its highest point. Progressively smaller quantities produce an intense effect until even a minimal dose creates an overwhelming response. A very small amount may be enough for the person addicted to substances to lose what little sound judgment remained. The body attempts to defend itself against the toxic substance: urinary and fecal incontinence, sweating, vomiting, and tremors occur after use and sometimes immediately before it. The alienation associated with the chronic phase is unmistakable. Death from overdose and episodes of severe mental disturbance are frequent during this stage.

During the chronic phase, the addicted person becomes isolated and marginalized after losing personal values, existential dynamics, and the emotional, occupational, and social environments in which they once functioned. Much of the sense of direction, ownership, and identity disappears. Sound judgment may be lost completely, placing both the individual’s life and the lives of others in constant danger. Recovery remains possible during this stage, although most chronically addicted individuals have already made unsuccessful attempts to control the addiction. The damage is so evident that denial tends to diminish, but avoidance of responsibility for recovery becomes more pronounced (Ortiz, 2008, p. 54).

In this phase, the person acts with a complete loss of control over overwhelming desires and uses without wanting to, automatically and compulsively. They are willing to pay any price for another episode and lose perspective on the value of objects, money, and the affection of loved ones. Their thoughts develop a marked paranoid tendency: they feel watched, alone, humiliated, powerless before life, and discriminated against because of the addictive behavior. The person is a victim of the disease and is entirely overwhelmed by the unwanted effects of withdrawal. Finally, failures of attitude and the loss of assertive thinking create severe problems. The only way out is abstinence (Ortiz, 2008, p. 54).

TYPES OF ADDICTED INDIVIDUALS

We again wish to emphasize that “not everyone who uses a substance is addicted; not everyone who drinks alcohol is an alcoholic; and not every young person who has tried marijuana is addicted.” Having described the phases of addiction, we will now address different types of addicted individuals in order to provide a fuller understanding of the complex disease of addiction. These are cyclical and institutionalized addicted individuals.

The Cyclical Addict

The cyclical addict is characterized by an insufficient assimilation or understanding of the disease. When emotional well-being begins to return, the person feels strongly attracted to substance use and believes that permission to use has been regained. Cyclical addiction occurs when people begin a recovery process and remain abstinent for a period, but later relapse and repeatedly restart recovery, whether in an institution, through support or prayer groups, or independently.

The cycles experienced by this type of addicted person tend to be similar in duration for that individual, although the length of the cycles differs from one person to another. A person is considered a cyclical addict when the intervals between addictive episodes exceed 30 days; otherwise, the individual may be experiencing one of the previously described phases. Recovery is possible when the errors in earlier recovery processes are identified, exposed, and resolved (Ortiz, 2008, p. 54).

With time and abstinence, a chronically addicted person may move back to the critical phase and from the critical to the intermediate phase. However, recovery of tolerance levels for the substance has not been demonstrated; in this sense, the addiction is irreversible. The interval between episodes may change, and the intensity may decrease, provided that use is reduced by more than 95 percent over a three-year period. Even then, there is an extremely serious risk that a new episode will re-establish the pattern of use. Maintaining abstinence is therefore the best course, because each new episode brings back the unwanted symptoms of the addiction and the secondary effects of substance use.

The Institutionalized Addict

The institutionalized addict is a person whose will is severely restricted. Even when attempting recovery, the individual can remain sober for extended periods only when personal freedom is limited through confinement in an institution. It should be remembered that every person with addiction can recover with an effective rehabilitation program (Ortiz, 2008, p. 55).

In summary, cyclical addicts remain abstinent for a period but later relapse and resume the disease at the point where they left it, interrupting the recovery process. Institutionalized addicts, by contrast, are able to achieve a degree of sobriety only while confined in a rehabilitation center.

Special attention must be paid to the treatment provided. Without effective treatment that addresses personality maladjustment, a person with addiction can easily transition from one addiction to another. So-called cross-addictions involve replacing one addiction with another—one substance with another substance, gambling with substance use, gambling with food, attachment to a person with substance use, and many other substitutions. These patterns preserve obsessiveness and the poor management of precipitating factors and facilitators, ultimately triggering irrational, avoidant, and compulsive behavior. Unfortunately, the number of multiple addictions and dual diagnoses being recorded continues to increase.

References

Campos, R. (1999). Between Vice and Disease: The Medical-Social Construction of Alcoholism as a Pathology in Spain in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Trastornos Adictivos, 1(3), 0–310. Available at: http://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-trastornos-adictivos-182-articulo-entre-el-vicio-enfermedad-la-13010700

Dictionary of the Spanish Language. (2019). Asocial. Royal Spanish Academy. Tricentennial Edition. 2018 Update. Retrieved from: https://dle.rae.es/?id=42AJcTG

Dictionary of the Spanish Language. (2019a). Antisocial. Royal Spanish Academy. Tricentennial Edition. 2018 Update. Retrieved from: https://dle.rae.es/?id=2wT5n8C

Fonseca, F. (2017). Genetics and Addictions. In M. Waisman & A. Benabarre (Eds.), Addictions: Psychoactive Substance Use and Clinical Presentations of Addictive Disease (pp. 21–31). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Médica Panamericana.

Fundación Función Futuro. (2017). Progress Report on the Outcomes of Patients Treated through the Comprehensive Biopsychosocial-Spiritual Approach, 2006–2017. Bogotá, Colombia: Fundación Función Futuro.

Fundación Función Futuro. (2017a). Clinical Records of Treated Patients, 2006–2017. Bogotá, Colombia: Fundación Función Futuro.

Galimberti, U. (2002). Dictionary of Psychology. Mexico City, Mexico: Siglo XXI Editores.

Homer. (1987). The Odyssey. [Spanish translation of Odysseia]. J. Calvo (Trans.). Madrid, Spain: Cátedra.

Jaramillo, A. (2020). Bioethical Psychology. Psychology for Everyone Series. Manuscript in preparation.

Kuhar, M. (2012). A Psychodynamic Perspective on the Efficacy of 12-Step Programs. In The Addicted Brain: Why We Abuse Drugs, Alcohol, and Nicotine (pp. 216–218). Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press.

World Health Organization. (1954). Expert Committee on Mental Health, Subcommittee on Alcoholism: Second Report. Scientific Publications No. 7. Technical Report Series No. 48. Washington, DC: PAHO/WHO.

World Health Organization. (1994). Lexicon of Alcohol and Drug Terms. Madrid, Spain: Spanish Ministry of Health and Consumer Affairs.

Ortiz, A. J. (2008). Addiction and Eating Disorders: Unwanted Desires. Risk, Protection, and Liberation Factors through Spiritual Intelligence. Bogotá, Colombia: Proyecto Función Futuro.

Rahola, J. G. (n.d.). Differences among Craving, Priming, and Impulsivity in Alcohol-Use Disorders: The Clinical Utility of Nalmefene. [Electronic version]. Faculty of Medicine, University of Cádiz. Retrieved from: https://psicoadolescencia.com.ar/docs/temasprof7.pdf

Sáiz, P., García-Portilla, P., Paredes, B., Bascarán, M., & Bobes, J. (2009). Genetics of Addictions. In C. Pereiro (Ed.), Addiction Manual for Physicians in Specialist Training (pp. 133–149). Barcelona, Spain: SOCIDROGALCOHOL.

Stahl, S. M. (2011). Essential Psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific Foundations and Clinical Applications. Updated Second Edition. Barcelona, Spain: Ariel Neurociencia.

Terán, A., & Ledo, A. (2009). Clinical History in Addictions. In C. Pereiro (Ed.), Addiction Manual for Physicians in Specialist Training (pp. 211–233). Barcelona, Spain: SOCIDROGALCOHOL.

Volkow, N. (2014). Drugs, the Brain, and Behavior: The Science of Addiction. Updated Edition. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drugs (NHI).

Notes

[1] It should be remembered that tolerance consists of a progressive increase in the dose of a drug required to maintain its subjective effects (Terán & Ledo, 2009, p. 223). Withdrawal appears when administration is stopped abruptly (Stahl, 2011), and its symptoms are the opposite of those produced by the drugs (Kuhar, 2012).

[2] Jellinek served as a WHO consultant on alcoholism. At the time of this publication, he was Dean of the Institute of Alcohol Studies at Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas, United States (WHO, 1954, p. 2).

[3] We have adopted this term from psychological interventions used in cases of suicide. It is important for addictology to adopt terms from other specialties as metaconcepts that support clearer understanding. According to the WHO, the term used for a specialist in addiction medicine is “addiction specialist” or “addictologist.” By the late 1980s, “Addiction Medicine” had become the preferred term in the United States for the branch of medicine concerned with alcohol- and drug-related diseases (1994, p. 44).

[4] An irresistible mania or compulsion to consume toxic substances, whether psychoactive or not, including nail polish, soaps, and cleaning products, among others. This does not necessarily mean that the behavior meets the criteria for addiction.

[5] It is important to emphasize the theory of the three forms of control lost through addiction: (1) control over abstinence; (2) control over the ability to stop once use begins; and (3) control over behavior once the person is engaged in the use episode and dopamine release.

[6] Dual pathology is understood as the simultaneous presence of addiction and another significant psychological disorder.

[7] The addictive power of a substance is exogenous because it is a characteristic factor that originates outside the person (Ortiz, 2008, p. 35).

[8] The body’s organic resistance is an endogenous factor because it is part of the individual’s internal constitution (Ortiz, 2008, p. 35).

[9] Also known as dysmorphesthesia, this is the feeling of being particularly ugly, unpresentable, repulsive, or deformed (Galimberti, 2002, p. 339).

[10] These are tolerance thresholds relating primarily to frustration, criticism, rejection, harassment, betrayal, grief, and ridicule (Jaramillo, 2020).

[11] The absence of norms or rules (Galimberti, 2002, p. 84).

[12] This English word became widely known through the film Revenge of the Nerds. The nerds were highly studious, well-behaved, and obedient young people who did everything correctly.

[13] As previously defined in Chapter 1, bonding refers to the addictive potential of a substance or behavior—that is, its power to attach a person to continued use.

[14] As previously defined in Chapter 1, addictive kindling is an individual’s vulnerability to a substance.

[15] Priming is the desire to continue using after taking a small dose of an addictive substance or another substance that produces the same effect on the brain’s reward system (Wikler, 1948, as cited in Rahola, n.d., p. 7).

[16] A person who does not integrate into or form connections with the social body (DLE, 2019).

[17] Conduct that is contrary to the social order (DLE, 2019a).

[18] This force progressively disintegrates the self, character, confidence in oneself, personality, and sense of purpose—broadly speaking, the principal components of human will. This concept is drawn from certain approaches in Cuban psychiatry used in 2000 at the International Clinic for Addictions (Rosabel Soler, personal communication, 2000).